IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.51year2017issue1pp33-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capital Structure and Corporate Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Akram Naseem
  • Huanping Zhang
  • Fizzah Malik
  • Ramiz-Ur-Rehman

    (Xian Siyuan University, China
    Xi’an Jiaotong University, P.R.of China
    The University of Lahore, Pakistan)

Abstract

Capital structure determination is considered as one of the key corporate financing decisions and managers often face difficulty in finding the optimal one. There are various theories regarding this phenomenon in the finance literature and this issue has been discussed since long. No theory can be regarded as the conclusive one as varying evidences found regarding this complex issue. Presently, the need to determine an optimal capital structure has become more troublesome as well as important due to the emergence of a need of the best corporate governance practices. To mitigate agency problem, the organizations may implement code of corporate governance. This study aims to investigate about the impact of corporate governance on capital structure determination. Secondly, this study focuses on three well known capital structure theories i.e. trade-off theory, agency theory and pecking-order theory. Quantitative research design is used for this empirical study. Sample consists of panel data of the non-financial sector companies listed at Pakistan Stock Exchange for five years 2009-2013. The data of the variables of interest are collected from annual reports published by companies and the publications of State Bank of Pakistan. The companies are selected by taking a representative sample from the whole non-financial sector. Stratified Random Sampling technique is used by taking 10% of each sector and final selected firms are 40.Then, simple random sampling technique is used for the selection of a representative sample by using random number method. Panel data analysis and Hausman test reveal that fixed effects model is better than other options and Board size has a significant impact on Debt to equity ratio in positive direction in case of Pakistani firms operating in nonfinancial sector. We may infer that Pakistani firms have positive relationship between managerial ownership and capital structure. Since this relationship is insignificant in all regressions. The negative relationship of return on assets (ROA) and debt to equity ratio suggests that Pakistani firms earn higher returns on assets and such firms rely more on internal financing resulting in less use of debt, strong negative association has been found between liquidity and debt to equity whereas the relationship with firm size is observed negative as well as insignificant. The findings of this study can help to policy makers to give importance to Board size as it is an important determinant of capital structure as larger the size of board is, the better the monitoring and decision making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Akram Naseem & Huanping Zhang & Fizzah Malik & Ramiz-Ur-Rehman, 2017. "Capital Structure and Corporate Governance," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 51(1), pages 33-47, January-M.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue1:pp:33-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/654393
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Asif Joyo & Waqas Mahmood & Wajahutallh Khan, 2018. "Investigating The Stochastic Relationship Between Ownership And Firm Financial Performance: An Evidence From Listed Psx (Pakistan Stock Exchange) Sugar Companies Of Pakistan," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 14(1), pages 14-16.
    2. Harvey, Charles & Maclean, Mairi & Price, Michael, 2020. "Executive remuneration and the limits of disclosure as an instrument of corporate governance," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. Miriam Marcén & Marina Morales, 2021. "The intensity of COVID‐19 nonpharmaceutical interventions and labor market outcomes in the public sector," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 775-798, September.
    4. Cornelsen, Laura & Smith, Richard D., 2018. "Viewpoint: Soda taxes – Four questions economists need to address," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 138-142.
    5. Abdul Wahab, Nor Shaipah & Ntim, Collins G. & Mohd Adnan, Mohd Muttaqin & Tye, Wei Ling, 2018. "Top management team heterogeneity, governance changes and book-tax differences," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 30-46.
    6. La Madjid Samryn, 2023. "Financing Moderation in the Relationship of Investing Activities and the Bank Capital Adequacy Ratio," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(3), pages 1-64, June.
    7. Hunter, Benjamin M. & Murray, Susan F. & Marathe, Shweta & Chakravarthi, Indira, 2022. "Decentred regulation: The case of private healthcare in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    8. Zahid Bashir & Ghulam Ali Bhatti & Asad Javed, 2020. "Corporate governance and capital structure as driving force for financial performance: Evidence from non-financial listed companies in Pakistan," Business Review, School of Economics and Social Sciences, IBA Karachi, vol. 15(1), pages 108-133, January-J.
    9. Muhammad Asif Joyo & Waqas Mahmood & Wajahutallh Khan, 2018. "Investigating The Stochastic Relationship Between Ownership And Firm Financial Performance: An Evidence From Listed Psx (Pakistan Stock Exchange) Sugar Companies Of Pakistan," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 14(1), pages 69-80.
    10. Sarkki, Simo, 2017. "Governance services: Co-producing human well-being with ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 82-91.
    11. Datzberger, Simone, 2018. "Why education is not helping the poor. Findings from Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 124-139.
    12. Benjasak, Chonlakan & Bhattarai, Keshab, 2017. "General Equilibrium Impacts VAT and Corporate Tax in Thailand," MPRA Paper 88816, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Jul 2018.
    13. Lieberman, Alicea & Duke, Kristen E. & Amir, On, 2019. "How incentive framing can harness the power of social norms," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 118-131.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Capital Structure; Corporate Governance;

    JEL classification:

    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue1:pp:33-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.