IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jct/journl/v5y2010i2p106-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cash Flow Valuation of Maruti and Hyundai (An Analytical Perspective)

Author

Listed:
  • Ashima

    (Assistant Professor, JDMC, University of Delhi, New Delhi.)

  • Dr. S.C. Chitkara

    (Reader and Head, P.G. Faculty of Commerce, SSV College, Hapur, (Ghaziabad))

Abstract

This research paper focuses on an analytical valuation perspective of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. (MSIL) and Hyundai Motors India Ltd. (HMIL). MSIL is the no. one car maker in India and HMIL takes place second position. The companies were valued on the basis of 9 financial parameters. In the present era of Liberalization, Privatization and Globalization, the Market has become globally competitive; hence the survival of an enterprise depends upon the efficiency and accuracy, it is necessary to evaluate the financial performance of sampled units to know where these companies stand in the market and how these companies can improve further in the future by knowing their shortcomings.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashima & Dr. S.C. Chitkara, 2010. "Cash Flow Valuation of Maruti and Hyundai (An Analytical Perspective)," Journal of Commerce and Trade, Society for Advanced Management Studies, vol. 5(2), pages 106-111, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:jct:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:2:p:106-111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jctindia.org/index.php/jct/article/view/o10-ascc
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Liu & Doron Nissim & Jacob Thomas, 2002. "Equity Valuation Using Multiples," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 135-172, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yin‐Hua Yeh & Pei‐Gi Shu & Re‐Jin Guo, 2008. "Ownership Structure and IPO Valuation—Evidence from Taiwan," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 37(1), pages 141-161, March.
    2. Karel Janda, 2019. "Earnings Stability and Peer Company Selection for Multiple Based Indirect Valuation," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 69(1), pages 37-75, February.
    3. Waleed Khalid & Kashif Ur Rehman & Muhammad Kashif, 2019. "The Impact of Merger and Acquisition Firms on Stock Market Bubble," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(1), pages 335-342, March.
    4. Budi Frensidy & Ryan Joshua Pelealu & Robiyanto Robiyanto, 2020. "Analysis of Equity Valuation Models and Target Price Accuracy: An Evidence From Analyst Reports in Indonesia," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    5. Wen-Shiung Lee, 2013. "Merger and acquisition evaluation and decision making model," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(15-16), pages 1473-1494, December.
    6. Bogdan Alexandru DRĂGOI & Ion STANCU & Adrian MITROI & Andrei Tudor STANCU, 2016. "Financial Investment Companies (SIFS) Relative Valuation and Fundamentals," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 50(2), pages 25-40.
    7. Dimitrios Vamvourellis & M'at'e Toth & Snigdha Bhagat & Dhruv Desai & Dhagash Mehta & Stefano Pasquali, 2023. "Company Similarity using Large Language Models," Papers 2308.08031, arXiv.org.
    8. Olga Ferraro, 2021. "A Brief Overview of the IPO Valuation Methods," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(12), pages 1-41, July.
    9. Roosenboom, Peter, 2012. "Valuing and pricing IPOs," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1653-1664.
    10. Teng Andrea Xu & Jiahua Xu & Kristof Lommers, 2022. "DeFi vs TradFi: Valuation Using Multiples and Discounted Cash Flow," Papers 2210.16846, arXiv.org.
    11. Imtiaz Ahmad & Pascal Alphonse & Michel Levasseur, 2010. "Les Effets De La Croissance Et De L'Endettement Sur Les Multiples De Capitaux Propres : Representation Theorique Et Comparaison Internationale," Post-Print hal-00481584, HAL.
    12. Bartram, Söhnke M. & Grinblatt, Mark, 2018. "Agnostic fundamental analysis works," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 125-147.
    13. Kryzanowski, Lawrence & Mohsni, Sana, 2015. "Earnings forecasts and idiosyncratic volatilities," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 107-123.
    14. I-Cheng Yeh & Che-hui Lien, 2017. "Growth and value hybrid valuation model based on mean reversion," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(50), pages 5092-5116, October.
    15. Khaled Aljifri & Hafiz Imtiaz Ahmad, 2019. "Preferred Valuation Techniques in the UAE: A Comparative Study of Financial and Nonfinancial Sectors," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 51-59.
    16. WS Nel, 2015. "An Optimal Peer Group Selection Strategy for Multiples-Based Modelling in the South African Equity Market," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(3), pages 30-46.
    17. Adel Almasarwah, 2020. "Stock Price Informativeness and Profit Warnings: Empirical Analysis," Proceedings of the 19th International RAIS Conference, October 18-19, 2020 001aa, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    18. Christian Bach, 2011. "Conservatism in Corporate Valuation," CREATES Research Papers 2011-32, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    19. Pengguo Wang, 2018. "Future Realized Return, Firm‐specific Risk and the Implied Expected Return," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(1), pages 105-132, March.
    20. Andreou, Christoforos K. & Lambertides, Neophytos & Panayides, Photis M., 2021. "Distress risk anomaly and misvaluation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(5).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    PRivate institutions; Turnovers Retention; Job Satisfaction; Lecturee.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A0 - General Economics and Teaching - - General
    • C0 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jct:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:2:p:106-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Himanshu Agarwal (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.