IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jas/jasssj/2015-62-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Interaction Effects in Polarization: Individual Media Influence and the Impact of Town Meetings

Author

Listed:

Abstract

We are increasingly exposed to polarized media sources, with clear evidence that individuals choose those sources closest to their existing views. We also have a tradition of open face-to-face group discussion in town meetings, for example. There are a range of current proposals to revive the role of group meetings in democratic decision-making. Here, we build a simulation that instantiates aspects of reinforcement theory in a model of competing social influences. What can we expect in the interaction of polarized media with group interaction along the lines of town meetings? Some surprises are evident from a computational model that includes both. Deliberative group discussion can be expected to produce opinion convergence. That convergence may not, however, be a cure for extreme views polarized at opposite ends of the opinion spectrum. In a large class of cases, we show that adding the influence of group meetings in an environment of self-selected media produces not a moderate central consensus but opinion convergence at one of the extremes defined by polarized media.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Pulick & Patrick Korth & Patrick Grim & Jiin Jung, 2016. "Modeling Interaction Effects in Polarization: Individual Media Influence and the Impact of Town Meetings," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 19(2), pages 1-1.
  • Handle: RePEc:jas:jasssj:2015-62-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jasss.org/19/2/1/1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eszter Hargittai & Jason Gallo & Matthew Kane, 2008. "Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 67-86, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrick Mellacher, 2021. "Opinion Dynamics with Conflicting Interests," Papers 2111.09408, arXiv.org.
    2. Marijn A. Keijzer & Michael Mäs & Andreas Flache, 2018. "Communication in Online Social Networks Fosters Cultural Isolation," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deen Freelon & Marc Lynch & Sean Aday, 2015. "Online Fragmentation in Wartime," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 659(1), pages 166-179, May.
    2. Gorodnichenko, Yuriy & Pham, Tho & Talavera, Oleksandr, 2021. "Social media, sentiment and public opinions: Evidence from #Brexit and #USElection," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    3. repec:swn:wpaper:2018-01 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jas:jasssj:2015-62-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Francesco Renzini (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.