IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jas/jasssj/2010-101-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Schelling Model of Ethnic Residential Dynamics: Beyond the Integrated - Segregated Dichotomy of Patterns

Author

Abstract

The Schelling model of segregation is an agent-based model that illustrates how individual tendencies regarding neighbors can lead to segregation. The model is especially useful for the study of residential segregation of ethnic groups where agents represent householders who relocate in the city. In the model, each agent belongs to one of two groups and aims to reside within a neighborhood where the fraction of 'friends' is sufficiently high: above a predefined tolerance threshold value F. It is known that depending on F, for groups of equal size, Schelling's residential pattern converges to either complete integration (a random-like pattern) or segregation. The study of high-resolution ethnic residential patterns of Israeli cities reveals that reality is more complicated than this simple integration-segregation dichotomy: some neighborhoods are ethnically homogeneous while others are populated by both groups in varying ratios. In this study, we explore whether the Schelling model can reproduce such patterns. We investigate the model's dynamics in terms of dependence on group-specific tolerance thresholds and on the ratio of the size of the two groups. We reveal new type of model pattern in which a portion of one group segregates while another portion remains integrated with the second group. We compare the characteristics of these new patterns to the pattern of real cities and discuss the differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Erez Hatna & Itzhak Benenson, 2012. "The Schelling Model of Ethnic Residential Dynamics: Beyond the Integrated - Segregated Dichotomy of Patterns," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 15(1), pages 1-6.
    • Handle: RePEc:jas:jasssj:2010-101-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jasss.org/15/1/6/6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Junfu, 2004. "Residential segregation in an all-integrationist world," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 533-550, August.
    2. J Portugali & I Benenson, 1995. "Artificial Planning Experience by Means of a Heuristic Cell-Space Model: Simulating International Migration in the Urban Process," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(10), pages 1647-1665, October.
    3. Andreas Flache & Rainer Hegselmann, 2001. "Do Irregular Grids Make a Difference? Relaxing the Spatial Regularity Assumption in Cellular Models of Social Dynamics," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 4(4), pages 1-6.
    4. W. Clark, 1991. "Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: A test of the schelling segregation model," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 28(1), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Schelling, Thomas C, 1969. "Models of Segregation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 488-493, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Akihisa Okada & Daisuke Inoue & Shihori Koyama & Tadayoshi Matsumori & Hiroaki Yoshida, 2022. "Dynamical cooperation model for mitigating the segregation phase in Schelling’s model," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 95(10), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Roy Cerqueti & Luca De Benedictis & Valerio Leone Sciabolazza, 2022. "Segregation with social linkages: Evaluating Schelling’s model with networked individuals," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 384-440, May.
    3. Nicolás E. Amado & Marcos E. Gaudiano & Jorge A. Revelli, 2024. "Hidden quantization phenomenon in the sznajd model with initial structure," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 97(10), pages 1-11, October.
    4. Gaudiano, Marcos E. & Revelli, Jorge A., 2022. "On the role of structured initial conditions in the Schelling model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 587(C).
    5. Theordoros Panagiotakopoulos & George-Rafael Domenikos & Alexander V. Mantzaris, 2022. "Exploring Simulated Residential Spending Dynamics in Relation to Income Equality with the Entropy Trace of the Schelling Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Qingxu Huang & Dawn C Parker & Tatiana Filatova & Shipeng Sun, 2014. "A Review of Urban Residential Choice Models Using Agent-Based Modeling," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 41(4), pages 661-689, August.
    7. Bruno Adolfo Buffa & Damián Knopoff & Germán Torres, 2020. "Parameter Estimation and Measurement of Social Inequality in a Kinetic Model for Wealth Distribution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Stepinski, Tomasz F. & Dmowska, Anna, 2020. "Complexity in patterns of racial segregation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    9. Liliana Perez & Suzana Dragicevic & Jonathan Gaudreau, 2019. "A geospatial agent-based model of the spatial urban dynamics of immigrant population: A study of the island of Montreal, Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, July.
    10. Edmund Chattoe-Brown, 2014. "Using Agent Based Modelling to Integrate Data on Attitude Change," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(1), pages 159-174, February.
    11. Clémentine Cottineau, 2022. "Modéliser les inégalités dans l’espace géographique," Post-Print halshs-03801388, HAL.
    12. Edmund Chattoe-Brown, 2013. "Why Sociology Should Use Agent Based Modelling," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(3), pages 31-41, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abhinav Singh & Dmitri Vainchtein & Howard Weiss, 2009. "Schelling's Segregation Model: Parameters, scaling, and aggregation," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 21(12), pages 341-366.
    2. Pancs, Romans & Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2007. "Schelling's spatial proximity model of segregation revisited," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-2), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Florence Goffette-Nagot & Pablo Jensen & Sebastian Grauwin, 2009. "Dynamic models of residential segregation: Brief review, analytical resolution and study of the introduction of coordination," Post-Print halshs-00404400, HAL.
    4. Radi, Davide & Gardini, Laura & Avrutin, Viktor, 2014. "The role of constraints in a segregation model: The symmetric case," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 103-119.
    5. Itzhak Benenson & Erez Hatna & Ehud Or, 2009. "From Schelling to Spatially Explicit Modeling of Urban Ethnic and Economic Residential Dynamics," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 37(4), pages 463-497, May.
    6. Sheng Li & Kuo-Liang Chang & Lanlan Wang, 2020. "Racial residential segregation in multiple neighborhood markets: a dynamic sorting study," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 15(2), pages 363-383, April.
    7. David O'Sullivan, 2009. "Changing Neighborhoods—Neighborhoods Changing," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 37(4), pages 498-530, May.
    8. Harting, Philipp & Radi, Davide, 2020. "Residential segregation: The role of inequality and housing subsidies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 801-819.
    9. Radi, Davide & Gardini, Laura, 2015. "Entry limitations and heterogeneous tolerances in a Schelling-like segregation model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 130-144.
    10. Laura Gardini & Davide Radi, 2018. "A piecewise smooth model of evolutionary game for residential mobility and segregation," Working Papers 1802, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2018.
    11. Gandica, Yerali & Gargiulo, Floriana & Carletti, Timoteo, 2016. "Can topology reshape segregation patterns?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 46-54.
    12. Grauwin, Sébastian & Goffette-Nagot, Florence & Jensen, Pablo, 2012. "Dynamic models of residential segregation: An analytical solution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 124-141.
    13. John Lynham & Philip R. Neary, 2021. "Tiebout sorting in online communities," Papers 2110.05608, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    14. John Lynham & Philip R. Neary, 2024. "Tiebout sorting in online communities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(3), pages 1149-1174, October.
    15. Roy Cerqueti & Luca De Benedictis & Valerio Leone Sciabolazza, 2022. "Segregation with social linkages: Evaluating Schelling’s model with networked individuals," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 384-440, May.
    16. Bithell, M. & Macmillan, W.D., 2007. "Escape from the cell: Spatially explicit modelling with and without grids," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 59-78.
    17. Logan, Trevon D. & Parman, John M., 2017. "The National Rise in Residential Segregation," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 77(1), pages 127-170, March.
    18. Florent Dubois & Christophe Muller, 2017. "Segregation and the Perception of the Minority," Working Papers halshs-01520308, HAL.
    19. Peteke Feijten & Maarten van Ham, 2009. "Neighbourhood Change... Reason to Leave?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(10), pages 2103-2122, September.
    20. van Ham, Maarten & Manley, David, 2013. "Occupational Mobility and Living in Deprived Neighbourhoods: Housing Tenure Differences in 'Neighbourhood Effects'," IZA Discussion Papers 7815, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jas:jasssj:2010-101-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Francesco Renzini (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.