IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jaf/journl/v8y2017i1n73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

honoraires incitatifs au cœur d’une réflexion sur la qualité d’audit en Afrique subsaharienne francophone

Author

Listed:
  • Alain Gilles FOKA TAGNE
  • Joseph NDASSI YEPGNOU
  • David KAMDEM

Abstract

La vulnérabilité des commissaires aux comptes vis-à-vis des dirigeants sont des sujets qui alimentent actuellement la chronique en Afrique subsaharienne et plus particulièrement au Cameroun. C’est dans cette perspective que notre étude s’ambitionne de vérifier si la qualité d’audit dans cette contrée de la planète ne serait-elle pas attribuable au manque d’incitation liée aux honoraires. En s’appuyant sur les analyses de classification et économétriques par la méthode de la régression logistique sur les données recueillies par questionnaire auprès de 40 cabinets d’audit au Cameroun, les résultats montrent que la qualité de l’audit peut s’expliquer par les honoraires incitatifs. Plus spécifiquement, ce résultat montre que la probabilité d’avoir un audit de qualité est d’autant plus grande lorsque les honoraires d’audit sont négociés à la hausse et d’autant plus faible, s’ils sont négociés à la baisse.

Suggested Citation

  • Alain Gilles FOKA TAGNE & Joseph NDASSI YEPGNOU & David KAMDEM, 2017. "honoraires incitatifs au cœur d’une réflexion sur la qualité d’audit en Afrique subsaharienne francophone," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 8(1), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:jaf:journl:v:8:y:2017:i:1:n:73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://34.195.102.181/journal/index.php/index/article/view/89
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Riadh Manita & Makram Chemangui, 2007. "Les Approches D'Evaluation Et Les Indicateurs De Mesure De La Qualite D'Audit: Une Revue Critique," Post-Print halshs-00534780, HAL.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9283 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Santanu Mitra & Mahmud Hossain & Donald Deis, 2007. "The empirical relationship between ownership characteristics and audit fees," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 257-285, April.
    4. Riadh Manita, 2009. "La qualité du processus d'audit : une étude empirique sur le marché financier tunisien," Post-Print halshs-00455733, HAL.
    5. David C. Hay & W. Robert Knechel & Norman Wong, 2006. "Audit Fees: A Meta†analysis of the Effect of Supply and Demand Attributes," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1), pages 141-191, March.
    6. Makram Chemangui & Riadh Manita & Benoit Pigé, 2007. "Les approches d'évaluation et les indicateurs de mesure de la qualité d'audit, étude critique," Post-Print hal-00760211, HAL.
    7. Makram Chemangui & Riadh Manita, 2007. "Les approches d'évaluation et les indicateurs de mesure de la qualité d'audit : Etude critique," Post-Print hal-00760209, HAL.
    8. Rick Antle & Elizabeth Gordon & Ganapathi Narayanamoorthy & Ling Zhou, 2006. "The joint determination of audit fees, non-audit fees, and abnormal accruals," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 235-266, November.
    9. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    10. David Carassus & Denis Cormier, 2003. "Normes et pratiques de l'audit externe légal en matière de prévention et de détection de la fraude," Post-Print hal-03073811, HAL.
    11. Charles Piot, 2001. "Agency costs and audit quality: evidence from France," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 461-499.
    12. Abir Sakka & Riadh Manita, 2011. "Les comportements de l'audité affectant la qualité de l'audit : Une étude exploratoire sur le marché Français," Post-Print hal-00650570, HAL.
    13. Bernard Colasse, 2003. "Auditer, une mission impossible ?," Post-Print halshs-00667487, HAL.
    14. Rick Antle & Elizabeth Gordon & Ganapathi Narayanamoorthy & Ling Zhou, 2002. "The Joint Determination of Audit Fees, Non-Audit Fees, and Abnormal Accruals," Yale School of Management Working Papers amz2502, Yale School of Management, revised 02 May 2006.
    15. Ines Gaddour, 2013. "Contribution A L'Étude Des Comportements Dysfonctionnels Des Auditeurs Seniors : Une Approche Managériale (Le Cas Français)," Post-Print hal-01002376, HAL.
    16. Makram Chemangui & Riadh Manita & Benoit Pigé, 2007. "Les approches d'évaluation et les indicateurs de mesure de la qualité d'audit : étude critique," Post-Print hal-00765280, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alain Gilles FOKA TAGNE & Joseph NDASSI YEPGNOU & David KAMDEM, 2017. "Les honoraires incitatifs au cœur d’une réflexion sur la qualité d’audit en Afrique subsaharienne francophone," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 8(1), June.
    2. Alain Gilles FOKA TAGNE & Prince Dubois KENFACK HIKOUATCHA & Joséphine Florentine MBADUET & Joseph NDASSI YEPGNOU, 2018. "Qualité d’audit, concentration de l’actionnariat et reporting financier," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 9(1), pages 27-54, June.
    3. Akihiro Yamada & Kento Fujita, 2022. "Impact of Parent Companies and Multiple Large Shareholders on Audit Fees in Stakeholder-Oriented Corporate Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    4. O. J. Ilaboya & M. O. Izevbekhai & G. Ohiokha, 2017. "Determinants Of Abnormal Audit Fees In Nigerian Quoted Companies," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 26(1), pages 65-83, june.
    5. Raúl Barroso & Chiraz Ben Ali & Cédric Lesage, 2018. "Blockholders’ Ownership and Audit Fees: The Impact of the Corporate Governance Model," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 149-172, January.
    6. Mary Kehinde Salawu, 2017. "Factors Influencing Auditor Independence among Listed Companies in Nigeria: Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) Approach," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(8), pages 191-203, August.
    7. Alain Gilles FOKA TAGNE & Prince Dubois KENFACK HIKOUATCHA & Joséphine Florentine MBADUET & Joseph NDASSI YEPGNOU, 2018. "Qualité d’audit, concentration de l’actionnariat et reporting financier," Journal of Academic Finance, RED research unit, university of Gabes, Tunisia, vol. 9(1), pages 27-54, June.
    8. Persakis, Anthony & Iatridis, George Emmanuel, 2016. "Audit quality, investor protection and earnings management during the financial crisis of 2008: An international perspective," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 73-101.
    9. Kharuddin, Khairul Ayuni Mohd & Basioudis, Ilias G & Farooque, Omar Al, 2021. "Effects of the Big 4 national and city-level industry expertise on audit quality in the United Kingdom," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    10. Steven Lustgarten & John Shon, 2013. "Do abnormal accruals affect the life expectancy of audit engagements?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 443-466, April.
    11. Kam-Wah Lai & Ferdinand A. Gul, 2021. "Do failed auditors receive lower audit fees from continuing engagements?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1159-1190, April.
    12. Tobias Svanstr�m, 2013. "Non-audit Services and Audit Quality: Evidence from Private Firms," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 337-366, June.
    13. Shan, Yuan George & Troshani, Indrit & Tarca, Ann, 2019. "Managerial ownership, audit firm size, and audit fees: Australian evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 18-36.
    14. Stergios Leventis & Emmanouil Dedoulis & Omneya Abdelsalam, 2018. "The Impact of Religiosity on Audit Pricing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 53-78, March.
    15. Ho, Nam, 2023. "Local competition and auditors' provision of non-audit services," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    16. Mohamed Sadok GASSOUMA, 2019. "Abnormal accounting accruals Management by market disciplinary approach: Evidence in Tunisian banks before and after the Arab Revolution," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 8(2), pages 1-2.
    17. María Consuelo Pucheta‐Martínez & Inmaculada Bel‐Oms & Lúcia Lima Rodrigues, 2019. "The engagement of auditors in the reporting of corporate social responsibility information," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 46-56, January.
    18. Alhababsah, Salem & Alhaj-Ismail, Alaa, 2023. "Does shared tenure between audit committee chair and engagement partner affect audit outcomes? Evidence from the UK," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    19. Santanu Mitra & Hakjoon Song & Sang Mook Lee & Shin Hyoung Kwon, 2020. "CEO tenure and audit pricing," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 427-459, August.
    20. Fatiha Id ahmad & Omar Hniche & Badre Eddine Chegri, 2023. "External audit quality : revue of literature [Qualité de l'audit externe : Revue de littérature]," Post-Print hal-03956881, HAL.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • N8 - Economic History - - Micro-Business History
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jaf:journl:v:8:y:2017:i:1:n:73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oussama Quentin Kasseh (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/urredtn.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.