IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ist/journl/v68y2018i1p161-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Underground Economy on the Sustainability of Tax Policy in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Ekrem Toparlak

    (Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Public Finance, Nigde, Turkey)

  • Hünkar GÜLER

    (Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Public Finance, Nigde, Turkey)

Abstract

This paper attempts to first evaluate the effects of underground economy on the sustainability of tax receipts, and then to search new approaches in tax policy. Underground economy reduces predictability in economic policy, decreases tax receipts, and encourages illegal activities. In Turkey, shifting taxation on indirect and labor-income taxes has created tax corridors (or tax traps), which makes the sustainability of tax receipts even more difficult. As a result, as put forward in this paper, underground economy in developed countries is lower than in developing countries. National trust in indirect taxes, which decrease the underground economy, is no longer accepted, and tax audiences in Turkey provide additional tax receipts for budgets. In Turkey, receipts from taxes on consumption have recently reached an upper limit, and this has created tax corridors, and thus tax policies have lost their elasticity. To maintain fiscal discipline, productivity of public expenditures should be increased, and the problems associated with underground economy should be tackled.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekrem Toparlak & Hünkar GÜLER, 2018. "The Impact of Underground Economy on the Sustainability of Tax Policy in Turkey," Istanbul Journal of Economics-Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 68(1), pages 161-179, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ist:journl:v:68:y:2018:i:1:p:161-179
    DOI: 10.26650/ISTJECON405075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/1CD58DF90A/BA98409ED0DE42DDA3D0D56D60600C1C?doi=10.26650/ISTJECON405075
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://ije.istanbul.edu.tr/en/yazi/10-26650-istjecon405075-4F00370053005900790063004C0070006E0039006B003100
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26650/ISTJECON405075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carolina Torres & Kirsti Mellbye & Bert Brys, 2012. "Trends in Personal Income Tax and Employee Social Security Contribution Schedules," OECD Taxation Working Papers 12, OECD Publishing.
    2. Albu, Lucian Liviu, 2007. "Underground Economy And Fiscal Policies Modeling," Working Papers of Institute for Economic Forecasting 071202, Institute for Economic Forecasting.
    3. Schneider, Friedrich & Buehn, Andreas, 2012. "Shadow Economies in Highly Developed OECD Countries: What Are the Driving Forces?," IZA Discussion Papers 6891, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Barrie Russell, 2010. "Revenue Administration: Managing the Shadow Economy," IMF Technical Notes and Manuals 2010/014, International Monetary Fund.
    5. Barrie Russell, 2010. "Revenue Administration; Managing the Shadow Economy," IMF Technical Notes and Manuals 10/14, International Monetary Fund.
    6. Richard M. Bird & J. Scott Wilkie, 2012. "Designing Tax Policy: Constraints and Objectives in an Open Economy," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1224, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    7. Dominik H. Enste & Friedrich Schneider, 2000. "Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(1), pages 77-114, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Poufinas & George Galanos & Charalampos Agiropoulos, 2021. "The Impact of Competitiveness on the Shadow Economy," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 27(1), pages 29-46, February.
    2. Francesco Busato & Bruno Chiarini, 2013. "Steady State Laffer Curve with the Underground Economy," Public Finance Review, , vol. 41(5), pages 608-632, September.
    3. K. Sudhir & Debabrata Talukdar, 2015. "The "Peter Pan Syndrome" in Emerging Markets: The Productivity-Transparency Tradeoff in IT Adoption," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1980, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    4. Schneider Friedrich & Buehn Andreas, 2017. "Shadow Economy: Estimation Methods, Problems, Results and Open questions," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Ceyhun Elgin & Friedrich Schneider, 2016. "Shadow Economies in OECD Countries: DGE vs. MIMIC Approaches," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 51-75.
    6. Omodero Cordelia Onyinyechi, 2019. "The Financial and Economic Implications of Underground Economy: The Nigerian Perspective," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 155-167, July.
    7. Friedrich SCHNEIDER, 2016. "Estimating the Size of the Shadow Economy: Methods, Problems and Open Questions," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 256-280, June.
    8. Colombo, Emilio & Onnis, Luisanna & Tirelli, Patrizio, 2016. "Shadow economies at times of banking crises: Empirics and theory," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 180-190.
    9. Mykolas Navickas & Vytautas JuÅ¡Ä ius & Valentinas Navickas, 2019. "Determinants of Shadow Economy in Eastern European Countries," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 66(1), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Dagmara Nikulin, 2016. "How To Define And Measure Informal Employment In Developed Countries? A Case Of Poland," GUT FME Working Paper Series A 35, Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdansk University of Technology.
    11. K. Sudhir & Debabrata Talukdar, 2015. "The “Peter Pan Syndrome” in Emerging Markets: The Productivity-Transparency Trade-off in IT Adoption," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 500-521, July.
    12. Andreas BUEHN & Friedrich SCHNEIDER, 2016. "Size and Development of Tax Evasion in 38 OECD Coutries: What do we (not) know?," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1-11, March.
    13. Alexandra Rudolph & Friedrich Schneider, 2017. "International Human Trafficking: Measuring Clandestinity by the Structural Equation Approach," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 39-58.
    14. Can Sever & Emekcan Yucel, 2021. "Does Informality Hinder Financial Development Convergence? Abstract:," Working Papers 2021/02, Bogazici University, Department of Economics.
    15. Friedrich Schneider, 2013. "Size and Progression of the Shadow Economies of Turkey and Other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2013; Some New Facts," Ekonomi-tek - International Economics Journal, Turkish Economic Association, vol. 2(2), pages 83-116, May.
    16. Collen Lediga & Nadine Riedel & Kristina Strohmaier, 2018. "Combatting Tax Evasion: Evidence from Comparing Commercial and Business Tax Registry," CESifo Working Paper Series 7117, CESifo.
    17. Albu, Lucian-Liviu & Nicolae, Mariana, 2003. "Use of households survey data to estimate the size of the informal economy in Romania," MPRA Paper 14286, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Duc Hong Vo & Ha Minh Nguyen & Tan Manh Vo & Michael McAleer, 2020. "Information Sharing, Bank Penetration and Tax Evasion in Emerging Markets," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Schneider, Friedrich, 2014. "The Shadow Economy and Shadow Labor Force: A Survey of Recent Developments," IZA Discussion Papers 8278, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Ioannis Kostakis, 2017. "The impact of shadow economy and/or corruption on private consumption: further evidence from selected Eurozone economies," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 7(3), pages 411-434, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Underground economy; tax policy; optimal taxation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G0 - Financial Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ist:journl:v:68:y:2018:i:1:p:161-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ertugrul YASAR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifisttr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.