Author
Listed:
- Seda Yıldırım
(Bilecik Åžeyh Edebali University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Business, Bilecik,Turkiye)
- Gözde Koca
(Bilecik Åžeyh Edebali University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences,Bilecik, Turkiye)
- Özüm Eğilmez
(Bilecik Åžeyh Edebali University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Bilecik, Turkiye.)
Abstract
Innovation has become an important competitive tool as it increases the efficiency and profitability of enterprises and provides the opportunity to enter new markets and grow in the existing market area. The important thing is not to harm the environment while the businesses continue their activities. Therefore, the innovations and activities carried out are happened to be environmentally friendly and have an aspect that will reduce the negative effects on the environment. However, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) cannot adopt green practices due to various barriers. In this context, this study aims to analyze and solve the factors that hinder green innovation and green initiatives in SMEs. In the study, firstly, the literature was searched, and six main barriers were determined as "economic barriers", "market barriers", "political barriers", "lack of information", "technological barriers" and "administrative barriers". Barriers were analyzed using Fuzzy ISM-MICMAC and Fuzzy DEMATEL methods by taking expert opinions from 18 SMEs in the Electrical and Electronics sector. The structural relationship model between the barriers was revealed with the Fuzzy ISM-MICMAC analysis methods. The effect-importance degree of the barriers was determined by the Fuzzy DEMATEL method, and their weights were calculated. As a result of the research, the most influential barriers to other barriers were determined as "economic barriers", "political" barriers" and "lack of information".
Suggested Citation
Seda Yıldırım & Gözde Koca & Özüm Eğilmez, 2023.
"Why Can Smes Not Adopt Green Innovation? An Assessment Via Fuzzy ISM-MICMAC-DEMATEL,"
EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(38), pages 127-148, June.
Handle:
RePEc:ist:ekoist:v:0:y:2023:i:38:p:127-148
DOI: 10.26650/ekoist.2023.38.1181676
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ist:ekoist:v:0:y:2023:i:38:p:127-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ertugrul YASAR The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ertugrul YASAR to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifisttr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.