IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orserv/v7y2015i4p294-314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparisons of Perceptions and Behavior in Ticket Queues and Physical Queues

Author

Listed:
  • Kaan Kuzu

    (Supply Chain, Operations Management, and Business Statistics, Sheldon B. Lubar School of Business, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53211)

Abstract

Ticket queues are systems that issue tickets to customers upon their arrival. Although ticket queues are preferred by many service providers, there is limited research on ticket queues, especially on customer perceptions of, preferences for, and behavior in these systems. We conducted a series of surveys to understand customer preferences and patience in a ticket queue and a physical queue (stand-in-line system) and to investigate whether the assumptions used in analytical queuing models for customer abandonment behavior are realistic. Study results indicate that subjects generally prefer ticket queues over physical queues and have greater patience in ticket queues than they do in physical queues. In addition, we observe that subjects are willing to wait longer than they initially were, assuming that they already have spent some time waiting in line. Using the survey results, we ran a series of simulation models by adjusting the traditional queuing assumptions and showed the impact of customer behavior on system performance measures in ticket and physical queues. Our results can assist managers, in determining the type of queue to implement under various service settings, and researchers, in modeling more realistic queuing systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaan Kuzu, 2015. "Comparisons of Perceptions and Behavior in Ticket Queues and Physical Queues," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 294-314, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:294-314
    DOI: 10.1287/serv.2015.0116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/serv.2015.0116
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/serv.2015.0116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orserv:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:294-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.