IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v6y1995i1p117-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guest Editorial

Author

Listed:
  • John Child

    (Judge Institute of Management Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom)

Abstract

It was with great pleasure and a sense of privilege that I received the invitation from Arie Lewin to contribute the guest editorial to this special issue of Organization Science . I was appointed Editor-in-Chief of Organization Studies in January 1992, since when Arie and I have kept in close touch. We are keenly aware of the different yet complementary traditions which stand behind the two journals, and which are manifest in their origins and their titles. We are therefore seeking ways of sharing information and improving mutual communication for the benefit of our readers. The occasional guest editorial is one such initiative, and we are also arranging for the exchange of advertisements and information on forthcoming articles. On this particular occasion, I shall say something about the origins and purpose of Organization Studies and then offer my perceptions of the contrast between the European and North American scenes.

Suggested Citation

  • John Child, 1995. "Guest Editorial," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 117-118, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:6:y:1995:i:1:p:117-118
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.6.1.117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.1.117
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.6.1.117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joan E. van Aken, 2004. "Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field‐Tested and Grounded Technological Rules," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 219-246, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:6:y:1995:i:1:p:117-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.