IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v70y2022i3p1371-1392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Risk Perception Gets in the Way: Probability Weighting and Underprevention

Author

Listed:
  • Aurélien Baillon

    (Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands)

  • Han Bleichrodt

    (Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands; Research School of Economics, Australian National University, ACT 0200 Canberra, Australia)

  • Aysil Emirmahmutoglu

    (Department of Business and Management Science, NHH Norwegian School of Economics, 5045 Bergen, Norway)

  • Johannes Jaspersen

    (Munich Risk and Insurance Center (MRIC), LMU Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany)

  • Richard Peter

    (Department of Finance, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242)

Abstract

Personal decisions about health hazards are the main cause of impaired health and premature death. People smoke and eat too much, and they exercise too little. The lack of preventive efforts is surprising given their proven effectiveness. In the early 1960s, Arrow suggested that moral hazard might be a reason for underprevention, but this explanation was later challenged. In this paper, we show that underprevention might be caused by misperceived probabilities. We derive when and how probability weighting gets in the way of prevention by blurring its benefits. We use a general model of prevention, encompassing several special cases from the literature. We also show how perceived ambiguity makes the problem of underprevention even worse by amplifying the effect of probability weighting.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurélien Baillon & Han Bleichrodt & Aysil Emirmahmutoglu & Johannes Jaspersen & Richard Peter, 2022. "When Risk Perception Gets in the Way: Probability Weighting and Underprevention," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(3), pages 1371-1392, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:3:p:1371-1392
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2019.1910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2019.1910
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2019.1910?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan Gaska, 2023. "Losses from Fluvial Floods in Poland over the 21st Century – Estimation Using the Productivity Costs Method," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 357-383, November.
    2. Emmanuelle Augeraud-Véron & Marc Leandri, 2024. "Optimal self-protection and health risk perceptions: Exploring connections between risk theory and the Health Belief Model," Post-Print hal-04557076, HAL.
    3. Yu Gao & Zhenxing Huang & Ning Liu & Jia Yang, 2024. "Are physicians rational under ambiguity?," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 183-203, April.
    4. Emmanuelle Augeraud-Véron & Marc Leandri, 2023. "Optimal self-protection and health risk perception: bridging the gap between risk theory and the Health Belief Model," EconomiX Working Papers 2023-12, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    5. Emmanuelle Augeraud‐Véron & Marc Leandri, 2024. "Optimal self‐protection and health risk perceptions: Exploring connections between risk theory and the Health Belief Model," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(7), pages 1565-1583, July.
    6. Richard Peter, 2024. "The economics of self-protection," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 49(1), pages 6-35, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:70:y:2022:i:3:p:1371-1392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.