IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v57y2009i1p157-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Adoption of Multiple Dependent Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Soo-Haeng Cho

    (Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)

  • Kevin F. McCardle

    (Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095)

Abstract

A firm often makes an adoption decision regarding an improvement of one technology depending on changes in other technologies. For example, a manufacturer with a serial production line considers jointly upgrading multiple machines, or a firm producing an assembled product considers improving several components simultaneously. Economies or diseconomies of scope in the fixed cost of adoption when multiple improvements are undertaken at the same time generate an economic dependence among the technological innovations. Although the literature on technological innovations has attributed slow adoption mainly to uncertainties outside the firm, this paper shows that the economic dependence that inherently defines cost relationships inside the firm can significantly influence the timing of adoption. Furthermore, this impact is not unidirectional: economic dependence can either expedite or delay the adoption of an improved technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Soo-Haeng Cho & Kevin F. McCardle, 2009. "The Adoption of Multiple Dependent Technologies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 157-169, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:57:y:2009:i:1:p:157-169
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.1080.0534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1080.0534
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.1080.0534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farzin, Y. H. & Huisman, K. J. M. & Kort, P. M., 1998. "Optimal timing of technology adoption," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 779-799, May.
    2. Sampath Rajagopalan & Medini R. Singh & Thomas E. Morton, 1998. "Capacity Expansion and Replacement in Growing Markets with Uncertain Technological Breakthroughs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 12-30, January.
    3. Rosenberg, Nathan, 1976. "On Technological Expectations," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 86(343), pages 523-535, September.
    4. Preyas Desai & Sunder Kekre & Suresh Radhakrishnan & Kannan Srinivasan, 2001. "Product Differentiation and Commonality in Design: Balancing Revenue and Cost Drivers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 37-51, January.
    5. Kornish, Laura J., 1999. "On Optimal Replacement Thresholds with Technological Expectations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 261-266, December.
    6. Arthur, W Brian, 1989. "Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(394), pages 116-131, March.
    7. Balcer, Yves & Lippman, Steven A., 1984. "Technological expectations and adoption of improved technology," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 292-318, December.
    8. Weiss, Allen M, 1994. "The Effects of Expectations on Technology Adoption: Some Empirical Evidence," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 341-360, December.
    9. Kathy A. Paulson Gjerde & Susan A. Slotnick & Matthew J. Sobel, 2002. "New Product Innovation with Multiple Features and Technology Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(10), pages 1268-1284, October.
    10. Chambers, Chester, 2004. "Technological advancement, learning, and the adoption of new technology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(1), pages 226-247, January.
    11. Cho, Danny I. & Parlar, Mahmut, 1991. "A survey of maintenance models for multi-unit systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 1-23, March.
    12. Shanling Li & Devanath Tirupati, 1994. "Dynamic Capacity Expansion Problem with Multiple Products: Technology Selection and Timing of Capacity Additions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(5), pages 958-976, October.
    13. Rommert Dekker & Ralph Wildeman & Frank Duyn Schouten, 1997. "A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 45(3), pages 411-435, October.
    14. Kornish, Laura J., 2006. "Technology choice and timing with positive network effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 268-282, August.
    15. Suresh K. Nair, 1995. "Modeling Strategic Investment Decisions Under Sequential Technological Change," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 282-297, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenjie Tang & Tong Wang & Wenxin Xu, 2022. "Sooner or Later? The Role of Adoption Timing in New Technology Introduction," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1663-1678, April.
    2. Hagspiel, Verena & Huisman, Kuno J.M. & Kort, Peter M. & Lavrutich, Maria N. & Nunes, Cláudia & Pimentel, Rita, 2020. "Technology adoption in a declining market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 380-392.
    3. James E. Smith & Canan Ulu, 2017. "Risk Aversion, Information Acquisition, and Technology Adoption," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1011-1028, August.
    4. Brozynski, Max T. & Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2020. "Markov models of policy support for technology transitions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1052-1069.
    5. Hagspiel, V. & Huisman, Kuno & Kort, Peter M. & Nunes, Claudia & Pimentel, Rita, 2018. "Product Innovation of an Incumbent Firm : A Dynamic Analysis," Discussion Paper 2018-048, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    6. H. Dharma Kwon, 2010. "Invest or Exit? Optimal Decisions in the Face of a Declining Profit Stream," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 638-649, June.
    7. James E. Smith & Canan Ulu, 2012. "Technology Adoption with Uncertain Future Costs and Quality," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 262-274, April.
    8. Hagspiel, Verena & Huisman, Kuno J.M. & Nunes, Clàudia, 2015. "Optimal technology adoption when the arrival rate of new technologies changes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 897-911.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Heng & Özer, Özalp, 2009. "Managing a product family under stochastic technological changes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 567-580, December.
    2. Doraszelski, Ulrich, 2004. "Innovations, improvements, and the optimal adoption of new technologies," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 1461-1480, April.
    3. Rahman, Atiqur & Loulou, Richard, 2001. "Technology acquisition with technological progress: effects of expectations, rivalry and uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 159-185, February.
    4. Hagspiel, Verena & Huisman, Kuno J.M. & Kort, Peter M. & Lavrutich, Maria N. & Nunes, Cláudia & Pimentel, Rita, 2020. "Technology adoption in a declining market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 380-392.
    5. Geroski, P. A., 2000. "Models of technology diffusion," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 603-625, April.
    6. H. Dharma Kwon, 2010. "Invest or Exit? Optimal Decisions in the Face of a Declining Profit Stream," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 638-649, June.
    7. Ilan Lobel & Jigar Patel & Gustavo Vulcano & Jiawei Zhang, 2016. "Optimizing Product Launches in the Presence of Strategic Consumers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1778-1799, June.
    8. Laura J. Kornish & Steven A. Lippman & John W. Mamer, 2011. "Search and the introduction of improved technologies," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(6), pages 578-594, September.
    9. Mariotti, Thomas & Décamps, Jean-Paul & Gensbittel, Fabien, 2021. "Investment Timing and Technological Breakthrough," CEPR Discussion Papers 16246, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. repec:bla:jecsur:v:12:y:1998:i:2:p:131-76 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Brozynski, Max T. & Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2020. "Markov models of policy support for technology transitions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1052-1069.
    12. Susan H. Xu & Zhaolin Li, 2007. "Managing a Single-Product Assemble-to-Order System with Technology Innovations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(9), pages 1467-1485, September.
    13. James E. Smith & Canan Ulu, 2012. "Technology Adoption with Uncertain Future Costs and Quality," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 262-274, April.
    14. Souza, Gilvan C., 2004. "Product introduction decisions in a duopoly," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(3), pages 745-757, February.
    15. Rob Hart, 2009. "Bad Eggs, Learning-by-doing, and the Choice of Technology," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 42(4), pages 429-450, April.
    16. R. Mark Krankel & Izak Duenyas & Roman Kapuscinski, 2006. "Timing Successive Product Introductions with Demand Diffusion and Stochastic Technology Improvement," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 119-135, June.
    17. Nicoletta Corrocher & Roberto Fontana, 2008. "Expectations, network effects and timing of technology adoption: some empirical evidence from a sample of SMEs in Italy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 425-441, December.
    18. Chambers, Chester, 2004. "Technological advancement, learning, and the adoption of new technology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(1), pages 226-247, January.
    19. Bruns, Peter, 2002. "Optimal maintenance strategies for systems with partial repair options and without assuming bounded costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 146-165, May.
    20. Seyed Habib A. Rahmati & Abbas Ahmadi & Kannan Govindan, 2018. "A novel integrated condition-based maintenance and stochastic flexible job shop scheduling problem: simulation-based optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 583-621, October.
    21. den Hartigh, E. & Langerak, F. & Commandeur, H.R., 2002. "The Effects of Self-Reinforcing Mechanisms on Firm Performance," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-46-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:57:y:2009:i:1:p:157-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.