IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v50y2002i5p751-763.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Achieving Environmental and Productivity Improvements Through Model-Based Process Redesign

Author

Listed:
  • Kumar Rajaram

    (The Anderson School at UCLA, 110 Westwood Plaza, Box 951481, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481)

  • Charles J. Corbett

    (The Anderson School at UCLA, 110 Westwood Plaza, Box 951481, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481)

Abstract

Large-scale industrial production processes face increasingly tight environmental constraints, which can be addressed through costly but relatively simple end-of-pipe solutions, or through cheaper but more subtle pollution prevention approaches. Achieving the process improvements necessary for pollution prevention is challenging due to the inherent complexity and unpredictability of several types of processes found in the food processing, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and specialty chemical industries. We propose an iterative procedure to achieve process improvements through model-based process redesign. This procedure is based on successive convex approximations of the process performance model, where product flows and process settings are optimized for a given configuration and the solution and dual variables of this optimization problem are used to update the process configuration following a greedy capacity reallocation procedure. We implemented this procedure over a five-year period at Cerestar, a major European producer of starch products, which led to a dramatic simplification in process configuration. Reduced energy and water consumption led to an estimated $3 million annual cost savings. Moreover, the reduction in environmental impacts allowed Cerestar to maintain current production levels without investing $100 million in additional wastewater treatment capacity to comply with new environmental constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Kumar Rajaram & Charles J. Corbett, 2002. "Achieving Environmental and Productivity Improvements Through Model-Based Process Redesign," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 751-763, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:50:y:2002:i:5:p:751-763
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.50.5.751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.50.5.751
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.50.5.751?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajaram, Kumar & Jaikumar, Ramchandran, 2002. "An interactive decision support system for on-line process control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 554-568, May.
    2. Corbett, Charles J. & Pan, Jeh-Nan, 2002. "Evaluating environmental performance using statistical process control techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 68-83, May.
    3. Mansooreh Mollaghasemi & Kenneth LeCroy & Michael Georgiopoulos, 1998. "Application of Neural Networks and Simulation Modeling in Manufacturing System Design," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 100-114, October.
    4. Julie Ann Stuart & Jane C. Ammons & Laura J. Turbini, 1999. "A Product and Process Selection Model with Multidisciplinary Environmental Considerations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 221-234, April.
    5. Aldowaisan, Tariq A. & Gaafar, Lotfi K., 1999. "Business process reengineering: an approach for process mapping," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 515-524, October.
    6. Zeger Degraeve & Gert Jan Koopman, 1998. "Achieving Air Quality Standards in the European Union," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(5), pages 643-654, October.
    7. Roger E. Bohn, 1995. "Noise and Learning in Semiconductor Manufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 31-42, January.
    8. Rajaram, Kumar & Jaikumar, Ramchandran, 2000. "Incorporating operator-process interactions in process control: A framework and an application to glucose refining," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 19-31, January.
    9. Fleischmann, Moritz & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & Dekker, Rommert & van der Laan, Erwin & van Nunen, Jo A. E. E. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1997. "Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Edward F. Watson, 1997. "An Application of Discrete-Event Simulation for Batch-Process Chemical-Plant Design," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 27(6), pages 35-50, December.
    11. Harvey J. Greenberg, 1995. "Mathematical Programming Models for Environmental Quality Control," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 578-622, August.
    12. Henk Folmer & H. L. Gabel & Hans Opschoor (ed.), 1995. "Principles of Environmental and Resource Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 168.
    13. Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & van Beek, Paul & Hordijk, Leen & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1995. "Interactions between operational research and environmental management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 229-243, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gong, Yeming & Liu, Jiawen & Zhu, Joe, 2019. "When to increase firms’ sustainable operations for efficiency? A data envelopment analysis in the retailing industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1010-1026.
    2. Charles J. Corbett & Robert D. Klassen, 2006. "Extending the Horizons: Environmental Excellence as Key to Improving Operations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 5-22, March.
    3. Vidya Mani & Suresh Muthulingam, 2019. "Does Learning from Inspections Affect Environmental Performance? Evidence from Unconventional Well Development in Pennsylvania," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 177-197, January.
    4. Sime Curkovic & Robert Sroufe, 2011. "Using ISO 14001 to promote a sustainable supply chain strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 71-93, February.
    5. Gahm, Christian & Denz, Florian & Dirr, Martin & Tuma, Axel, 2016. "Energy-efficient scheduling in manufacturing companies: A review and research framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 744-757.
    6. Yang, Jiawei & Li, Yuanyu & Fang, Lei, 2023. "Financing capacity planning with environmental considerations: A non-parametric analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. Ryan W. Buell & Basak Kalkanci, 2021. "How Transparency into Internal and External Responsibility Initiatives Influences Consumer Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 932-950, February.
    8. Suresh Muthulingam & Suvrat Dhanorkar & Charles J. Corbett, 2022. "Does Water Scarcity Affect Environmental Performance? Evidence from Manufacturing Facilities in Texas," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2785-2805, April.
    9. Basak Kalkanci & Erica L. Plambeck, 2020. "Managing Supplier Social and Environmental Impacts with Voluntary Versus Mandatory Disclosure to Investors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3311-3328, August.
    10. Kim, Youngsoo, 2022. "Taxi driver’s learning curves: An empirical analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-13.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corbett, Charles J. & Pan, Jeh-Nan, 2002. "Evaluating environmental performance using statistical process control techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 68-83, May.
    2. Chen, Chialin & Monahan, George E., 2010. "Environmental safety stock: The impacts of regulatory and voluntary control policies on production planning, inventory control, and environmental performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1280-1292, December.
    3. S. Maryam Masoumi & Nima Kazemi & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid, 2019. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Automotive Industry: A Process-Oriented Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-30, July.
    4. Srivastava, Samir K., 2008. "Network design for reverse logistics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 535-548, August.
    5. Daniel, S. E. & Diakoulaki, D. C. & Pappis, C. P., 1997. "Operations research and environmental planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 248-263, October.
    6. Gamberini, Rita & Gebennini, Elisa & Manzini, Riccardo & Ziveri, Andrea, 2010. "On the integration of planning and environmental impact assessment for a WEEE transportation network—A case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 937-951.
    7. Saberi, Sara & Cruz, Jose M. & Sarkis, Joseph & Nagurney, Anna, 2018. "A competitive multiperiod supply chain network model with freight carriers and green technology investment option," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 934-949.
    8. Ambreen Shafqat & Qurat ul An Sabir & Su-Fen Yang & Muhammad Aslam & Mohammed Albassam & Kashif Abbas, 2024. "Monitoring and Comparing Air and Green House Gases Emissions of Various Countries," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 29(3), pages 621-644, September.
    9. J. N. Pan & Sheau-Chiann Chen, 2013. "Correlated Risk Assessment and Its Managerial Applications," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    10. Rosič, Heidrun & Jammernegg, Werner, 2013. "The economic and environmental performance of dual sourcing: A newsvendor approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 109-119.
    11. Helena Ramalhinho-Lourenço, 2001. "Supply chain management: An opportunity for metaheuristics," Economics Working Papers 538, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    12. Brandenburg, Marcus & Govindan, Kannan & Sarkis, Joseph & Seuring, Stefan, 2014. "Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 299-312.
    13. Tang, Christopher S. & Zhou, Sean, 2012. "Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 585-594.
    14. Ozden Tozanli & Gazi Murat Duman & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2017. "Environmentally Concerned Logistics Operations in Fuzzy Environment: A Literature Survey," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-42, June.
    15. Rajaram, Kumar & Robotis, Andreas, 2004. "Analyzing variability in continuous processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 312-325, July.
    16. González-Torre, Pilar L. & Adenso-Díaz, Belarmino, 2006. "Reverse logistics practices in the glass sector in Spain and Belgium," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 527-546, October.
    17. Charles J. Corbett & Robert D. Klassen, 2006. "Extending the Horizons: Environmental Excellence as Key to Improving Operations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 5-22, March.
    18. Rajesh, R., 2020. "Sustainable supply chains in the Indian context: An integrative decision-making model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    19. Prahinski, Carol & Kocabasoglu, Canan, 2006. "Empirical research opportunities in reverse supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 519-532, December.
    20. Julie Ann Stuart & Jane C. Ammons & Laura J. Turbini, 1999. "A Product and Process Selection Model with Multidisciplinary Environmental Considerations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 221-234, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:50:y:2002:i:5:p:751-763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.