IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v49y2001i6p913-922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Min-Max-Sum Resource Allocation Problem and Its Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Selcuk Karabati

    (College of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 80910, Turkey)

  • Panagiotis Kouvelis

    (Olin School of Business, Washington University, Campus Box 1133, St Louis, Missouri 63130-4899)

  • Gang Yu

    (Department of MSIS, McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712)

Abstract

In this paper we consider a class of discrete resource-allocation problems with a min-max-sum objective function. We first provide several examples of practical applications of this problem. We then develop a branch-and-bound procedure for solving the general case of this computationally intractable problem. The proposed solution procedure employs a surrogate relaxation technique to obtain lower and upper bounds on the optimal objective function value of the problem. To obtain the multipliers of the surrogate relaxation, two alternative approaches are discussed. We also discuss a simple approximation algorithm with a tight bound. Our computational results support the effectiveness of the branch-and-bound procedure for fairly large-size problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Selcuk Karabati & Panagiotis Kouvelis & Gang Yu, 2001. "A Min-Max-Sum Resource Allocation Problem and Its Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 913-922, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:49:y:2001:i:6:p:913-922
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.49.6.913.10023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.49.6.913.10023
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.49.6.913.10023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muralidharan S. Kodialam & Hanan Luss, 1998. "Algorithms for Separable Nonlinear Resource Allocation Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 272-284, April.
    2. Hanan Luss, 1999. "On Equitable Resource Allocation Problems: A Lexicographic Minimax Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 361-378, June.
    3. Dan Trietsch & Kenneth R. Baker, 1993. "Basic Techniques for Lot Streaming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(6), pages 1065-1076, December.
    4. Christopher S. Tang, 1988. "A Max-Min Allocation Problem: Its Solutions and Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 359-367, April.
    5. Selcuk Karabati & Panagiotis Kouvelis & Gang Yu, 1995. "The Discrete Resource Allocation Problem in Flow Lines," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(9), pages 1417-1430, September.
    6. Fred Glover, 1975. "Surrogate Constraint Duality in Mathematical Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 434-451, June.
    7. Harvey J. Greenberg & William P. Pierskalla, 1970. "Surrogate Mathematical Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(5), pages 924-939, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Min Yang & Qingxian An & Tao Ding & Pengzhen Yin & Liang Liang, 2019. "Carbon emission allocation in China based on gradually efficiency improvement and emission reduction planning principle," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 278(1), pages 123-139, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renaud Chicoisne, 2023. "Computational aspects of column generation for nonlinear and conic optimization: classical and linearized schemes," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 789-831, April.
    2. Marco Antonio Boschetti & Vittorio Maniezzo, 2022. "Matheuristics: using mathematics for heuristic design," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 173-208, June.
    3. Alidaee, Bahram, 2014. "Zero duality gap in surrogate constraint optimization: A concise review of models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 241-248.
    4. Patriksson, Michael, 2008. "A survey on the continuous nonlinear resource allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 1-46, February.
    5. Kasin Ransikarbum & Scott J. Mason, 2016. "Multiple-objective analysis of integrated relief supply and network restoration in humanitarian logistics operations," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 49-68, January.
    6. Hu, Shu & Yu, Dennis Z. & Fu, Ke, 2023. "Online platforms’ warehouse capacity allocation strategies for multiple products," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Li, Linda & Firouz, Mohammad & Ahmed, Abdulaziz & Delen, Dursun, 2023. "On the Egalitarian–Utilitarian spectrum in stochastic capacitated resource allocation problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    8. Hanan Luss, 1999. "On Equitable Resource Allocation Problems: A Lexicographic Minimax Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 361-378, June.
    9. Ablanedo-Rosas, José H. & Rego, César, 2010. "Surrogate constraint normalization for the set covering problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 540-551, September.
    10. Galvao, Roberto D. & Gonzalo Acosta Espejo, Luis & Boffey, Brian, 2000. "A comparison of Lagrangean and surrogate relaxations for the maximal covering location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 377-389, July.
    11. Nieuwenhuizen, Thorsten, 1999. "Johri's general dual, the Lagrangian dual, and the surrogate dual," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 183-196, August.
    12. Christ, Quentin & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Lepelletier, Guillaume, 2019. "An Iterated Min–Max procedure for practical workload balancing on non-identical parallel machines in manufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 419-428.
    13. Gabrielle Demange, 2021. "On the resolution of cross-liabilities," PSE Working Papers halshs-03151128, HAL.
    14. Fujimoto, Masako & Yamada, Takeo, 2006. "An exact algorithm for the knapsack sharing problem with common items," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 693-707, June.
    15. B. Golany & N. Goldberg & U. Rothblum, 2015. "Allocating multiple defensive resources in a zero-sum game setting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 225(1), pages 91-109, February.
    16. Amy Givler Chapman & John E. Mitchell, 2018. "A fair division approach to humanitarian logistics inspired by conditional value-at-risk," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 262(1), pages 133-151, March.
    17. Chiu, Huan Neng & Chang, Jen Huei, 2005. "Cost models for lot streaming in a multistage flow shop," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 435-450, October.
    18. Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Vandaele, Nico, 2004. "Determining the optimal number of sublots in a single-product, deterministic flow shop with overlapping operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 221-239, December.
    19. D Biskup & M Feldmann, 2006. "Lot streaming with variable sublots: an integer programming formulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(3), pages 296-303, March.
    20. Jain, A. S. & Meeran, S., 1999. "Deterministic job-shop scheduling: Past, present and future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 390-434, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:49:y:2001:i:6:p:913-922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.