IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v15y1967i4p643-648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Note on the Theory of the Economy of Research

Author

Listed:
  • C. S. Peirce

    (United States Coast Survey)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • C. S. Peirce, 1967. "Note on the Theory of the Economy of Research," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 643-648, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:15:y:1967:i:4:p:643-648
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.15.4.643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.15.4.643
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.15.4.643?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marek Loužek, 2012. "Ekonomie vědy - naděje, nebo léčka? [Economics of Science - A Hope or a Pitfall?]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(4), pages 536-550.
    2. Marco Ottaviani, 2020. "Grantmaking," Working Papers 672, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    3. James Wible, 1994. "Book Reviews," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 314-329.
    4. Daniel Farhat, 2010. "Virtually Science: An Agent-based Model of the Rise and Fall of Scientific Research Programs," Working Papers 1015, University of Otago, Department of Economics, revised Oct 2010.
    5. Jonathan Chapman & Erik Snowberg & Stephanie Wang & Colin Camerer, 2018. "Loss Attitudes in the U.S. Population: Evidence from Dynamically Optimized Sequential Experimentation (DOSE)," CESifo Working Paper Series 7262, CESifo.
    6. Blandinieres, Florence & Pellens, Maikel, 2021. "Scientist's industry engagement and the research agenda: Evidence from Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-001, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:15:y:1967:i:4:p:643-648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.