IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v21y2019i3p536-555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Inventory and Supplier Encroachment

Author

Listed:
  • Huiqi Guan

    (Department of Management, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33146; School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Haresh Gurnani

    (Center for Retail Innovation, School of Business, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27106)

  • Xin Geng

    (Department of Management, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33146)

  • Yadong Luo

    (Department of Management, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33146; School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

Problem definition : In a two-period model of a dyadic supply chain, we study the interaction between the use of strategic inventory withholding by the buyer and the use of a direct selling channel (encroachment) by the supplier in the second period. Academic/practical relevance : While the extant OM literature has individually examined the two strategies, the system-wide combined effect of these strategies has not been studied. Methodology : We fill the gap by building and analyzing two decentralized models of vertical competition. The main model focuses on sequential quantity decisions where the buyer decides on its order quantity and sets its selling quantity, with a first-mover advantage, before the supplier decides on its direct selling quantity. In an extension, we also consider an alternative timing structure of simultaneous quantity competition. Results : For the sequential model, we find that for any finite holding cost, the buyer may withhold strategic inventory in certain cases. This makes the supplier less aggressive in using its direct selling strategy compared to the case when strategic inventory is not an option. Moreover, there exist situations where both the supplier and the buyer make higher profits from the combined use of their respective strategies at the same time. For the simultaneous model, the buyer can achieve higher profit than in the sequential model in certain scenarios. However, the supplier’s profit may drop below the benchmark case (when neither strategic inventory nor direct selling is present), which is not seen in the sequential model. As such, the buyer can benefit from losing its first-mover advantage, whereas the supplier may be worse off. Managerial implications : Our study provides useful managerial insights into the strategic (joint) moves of the players in a supply chain. We show that both the supplier and the buyer can benefit from vertical competition. Moreover, the first-mover advantage may not always increase profits for the players.

Suggested Citation

  • Huiqi Guan & Haresh Gurnani & Xin Geng & Yadong Luo, 2019. "Strategic Inventory and Supplier Encroachment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 536-555, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:21:y:2019:i:3:p:536-555
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2018.0705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2018.0705
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2018.0705?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gal-Or, Esther, 1985. "First Mover and Second Mover Advantages," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 26(3), pages 649-653, October.
    2. Saloner, Garth, 1986. "The role of obsolescence and inventory costs in providing commitment," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 333-345, September.
    3. Krishnan Anand & Ravi Anupindi & Yehuda Bassok, 2008. "Strategic Inventories in Vertical Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1792-1804, October.
    4. Hao Zhang & Mahesh Nagarajan & Greys Sošić, 2010. "Dynamic Supplier Contracts Under Asymmetric Inventory Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 1380-1397, October.
    5. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf & David E. M. Sappington, 2007. "The Bright Side of Supplier Encroachment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 651-659, 09-10.
    6. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf, 2013. "Managing Strategic Inventories via Manufacturer-to-Consumer Rebates," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 813-818, April.
    7. Wei-yu Kevin Chiang & Dilip Chhajed & James D. Hess, 2003. "Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual-Channel Supply-Chain Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Robin Hartwig & Karl Inderfurth & Abdolkarim Sadrieh & Guido Voigt, 2015. "Strategic Inventory and Supply Chain Behavior," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1329-1345, August.
    9. Joseph J. Spengler, 1950. "Vertical Integration and Antitrust Policy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(4), pages 347-347.
    10. Pınar Keskinocak & Kasarin Chivatxaranukul & Paul M. Griffin, 2008. "Strategic inventory in capacitated supply chain procurement," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 23-36.
    11. Dae-Hee Yoon, 2016. "Supplier Encroachment and Investment Spillovers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(11), pages 1839-1854, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Xi & Dai, Bin & Xie, Xia, 2024. "Supplier encroachment strategies in a retail platform with strategic inventory holding behavior," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. Li, Jin & Yi, Liao & Shi, Victor & Chen, Xiding, 2021. "Supplier encroachment strategy in the presence of retail strategic inventory: Centralization or decentralization?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Miao, Jie & Liu, Aijun & Wang, Ruiyao & Lu, Hui, 2022. "The influence of information asymmetry on the strategic inventory of deteriorating commodity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Xiaowei Hu & Jaejin Jang & Nabeel Hamoud & Amirsaman Bajgiran, 2021. "Strategic Inventories in a Supply Chain with Downstream Cournot Duopoly," Papers 2109.06995, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    5. Abhishek Roy & Stephen M. Gilbert & Guoming Lai, 2019. "The Implications of Visibility on the Use of Strategic Inventory in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1752-1767, April.
    6. Matsui, Kenji, 2024. "Should competing suppliers with dual-channel supply chains adopt agency selling in an e-commerce platform?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 587-604.
    7. Fabio Antoniou & Raffaele Fiocco, 2019. "Strategic inventories under limited commitment," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 50(3), pages 695-729, September.
    8. Huang, Song & Guan, Xu & Xiao, Binqing, 2018. "Incentive provision for demand information acquisition in a dual-channel supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 42-58.
    9. Wang, Ningning & Xing, Wei & Zhao, Xuan, 2022. "Strategic inventory in the presence of socially responsible dual distribution channels," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    10. Saha, Subrata & Mantin, Benny & Majumder, Sani & Nielsen, Izabela, 2024. "On the interdependence of strategic inventories and new product generation introduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    11. Nielsen, Izabela Ewa & Saha, Subrata, 2018. "Procurement planning in a multi-period supply chain: An epiphany," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 383-398.
    12. Jiahua Zhang & Lian Qi & Shilu Tong, 2021. "Dynamic Contract under Quick Response in a Supply Chain with Information Asymmetry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1273-1289, May.
    13. Matsui, Kenji, 2020. "Optimal bargaining timing of a wholesale price for a manufacturer with a retailer in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 225-236.
    14. Donna, Javier D. & Pereira, Pedro & Trindade, Andre & Yoshida, Renan C., 2020. "Direct-to-Consumer Sales by Manufacturers and Bargaining," MPRA Paper 105773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Li, Jin & Hu, Zening & Shi, Victor & Wang, Qian, 2021. "Manufacturer's encroachment strategy with substitutable green products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    16. Anil Arya & Hans Frimor & Brian Mittendorf, 2015. "Decentralized Procurement in Light of Strategic Inventories," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 578-585, March.
    17. Matsui, Kenji, 2016. "Asymmetric product distribution between symmetric manufacturers using dual-channel supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 646-657.
    18. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.
    19. Luo, Huajiang & Niu, Baozhuang, 2022. "Impact of competition type on a competitive manufacturer's preference of decision timing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    20. Zhang, Jianqiang & Cao, Qingning & He, Xiuli, 2020. "Manufacturer encroachment with advertising," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:21:y:2019:i:3:p:536-555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.