IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v14y2012i1p7-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Group Purchasing Organizations on Healthcare-Product Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Qiaohai (Joice) Hu

    (Olin School of Business, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130)

  • Leroy B. Schwarz

    (Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907)

  • Nelson A. Uhan

    (School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907)

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of group purchasing organizations (GPOs) on healthcare-product supply chains. The supply chain we study consists of a profit-maximizing manufacturer with a quantity-discount schedule that is nonincreasing in quantity and ensures nondecreasing revenue, a profit-maximizing GPO, a competitive source selling at a fixed unit price, and n providers (e.g., hospitals) with fixed demands for a single product. Each provider seeks to minimize its total purchasing cost (i.e., the cost of the goods plus the provider's own fixed transaction cost). Buying through the GPO offers providers possible cost reductions but may involve a membership fee. Selling through the GPO offers the manufacturer possibly higher volumes, but requires that the manufacturer pay the GPO a contract administration fee (CAF), i.e., a percentage of all revenue contracted through it. Using a game-theoretic model, we examine questions about this supply chain, including how the presence of a GPO affects the providers' total purchasing costs. We also address the controversy about whether Congress should amend the Social Security Act, which, under current law, permits CAFs. Among other things, we conclude that although CAFs affect the distribution of profits between manufacturers and GPOs, they do not affect the providers' total purchasing costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiaohai (Joice) Hu & Leroy B. Schwarz & Nelson A. Uhan, 2012. "The Impact of Group Purchasing Organizations on Healthcare-Product Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 7-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:14:y:2012:i:1:p:7-23
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.1110.0355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.1110.0355
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.1110.0355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schotanus, Fredo & Telgen, Jan & de Boer, Luitzen, 2008. "Unfair allocation of gains under the Equal Price allocation method in purchasing groups," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 162-176, May.
    2. Moulin, Herve, 1996. "Cost Sharing under Increasing Returns: A Comparison of Simple Mechanisms," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 225-251, April.
    3. Schotanus, Fredo & Telgen, Jan & de Boer, Luitzen, 2009. "Unraveling quantity discounts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 510-521, June.
    4. Moulin, Herve, 1995. "On Additive Methods to Share Joint Costs," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 98-99, August.
    5. Friedman, Eric & Moulin, Herve, 1999. "Three Methods to Share Joint Costs or Surplus," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 275-312, August.
    6. Marvel, Howard P. & Yang, Huanxing, 2008. "Group purchasing, nonlinear tariffs, and oligopoly," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 1090-1105, September.
    7. Daniel P. O'Brien & Greg Shaffer, 1997. "Nonlinear Supply Contracts, Exclusive Dealing, and Equilibrium Market Foreclosure," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(4), pages 755-785, December.
    8. Eric Friedman, 2004. "Strong monotonicity in surplus sharing," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 23(3), pages 643-658, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oktay Karabağ & Barış Tan, 2018. "Analysis of a group purchasing organization under demand and price uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 844-883, December.
    2. Gajanan Panchal & Vipul Jain & Naoufel Cheikhrouhou & Matthias Gurtner, 2017. "Equilibrium analysis in multi-echelon supply chain with multi-dimensional utilities of inertial players," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 417-436, August.
    3. Vernon N. Hsu & Guoming Lai & Baozhuang Niu & Wenqiang Xiao, 2017. "Leader-Based Collective Bargaining: Cooperation Mechanism and Incentive Analysis," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 72-83, February.
    4. Yu, Yunlong & Xiao, Tiaojun, 2021. "Analysis of cold-chain service outsourcing modes in a fresh agri-product supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Grzegorz Zimon & Robert Dankiewicz, 2020. "Trade Credit Management Strategies in SMEs and the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Case of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Grzegorz Zimon & Marek Sobolewski & Grzegorz Lew, 2020. "An Influence of Group Purchasing Organizations on Financial Security of SMEs Operating in the Renewable Energy Sector—Case for Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Jurriaan L. Jong & W. C. Benton, 2019. "Dependence and power in healthcare equipment supply chains," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 336-349, June.
    8. Yan, Yingchen & Zhao, Ruiqing & Lan, Yanfei, 2017. "Asymmetric retailers with different moving sequences: Group buying vs. individual purchasing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 903-917.
    9. Behzad Hezarkhani & Greys Sošić, 2019. "Who’s Afraid of Strategic Behavior? Mechanisms for Group Purchasing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(4), pages 933-954, April.
    10. Peng, Wenli & Merckx, Gilles & Chaturvedi, Aadhaar & Chevalier, Philippe, 2022. "Purchasing together or alone? Tradeoffs for information sharing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    11. Jun Zhao, 2022. "Will the community O2O service supply channel benefit the elderly healthcare service supply chain?," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1617-1650, December.
    12. Fang Fang & Harihara Prasad Natarajan, 2020. "Sourcing and Procurement Cost Allocation in Multi‐Division Firms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(3), pages 767-787, March.
    13. Lin, Jing & Ma, Xin & Talluri, Srinivas & Yang, Cheng-Hu, 2021. "Retail channel management decisions under collusion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 700-710.
    14. Iacocca, Kathleen & Mahar, Stephen & Daniel Wright, P., 2022. "Strategic horizontal integration for drug cost reduction in the pharmaceutical supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    15. Jain, Tarun & Hazra, Jishnu, 2017. "Sourcing strategies under agglomeration economies, capacity risks and retail competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 311-322.
    16. Li, Li & Jiang, Li, 2022. "Saving costs and improving selling through competitor cooperation in sourcing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 970-982.
    17. In, Joonhwan & Bradley, Randy V. & Bichescu, Bogdan C. & Smith, Antoinette L., 2019. "Breaking the chain: GPO changes and hospital supply cost efficiency," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 297-307.
    18. Zhou, Maosen & Dan, Bin & Ma, Songxuan & Zhang, Xumei, 2017. "Supply chain coordination with information sharing: The informational advantage of GPOs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 785-802.
    19. Hezarkhani, Behzad & Slikker, Marco & Van Woensel, Tom, 2018. "Collaborative replenishment in the presence of intermediaries," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 135-146.
    20. Yang, Yu-Chen & Cheng, Hsing Kenneth & Ding, Chao & Li, Shengli, 2017. "To join or not to join group purchasing organization: A vendor's decision," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 581-589.
    21. Zhou, Yuan & Xie, Jinxing, 2014. "Potentially self-defeating: Group buying in a two-tier supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 42-52.
    22. Pinar Keskinocak & Nicos Savva, 2020. "A Review of the Healthcare-Management (Modeling) Literature Published in Manufacturing & Service Operations Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 59-72, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koster, M.A.L., 1998. "Multi-Service Serial Cost Sharing : A Characterization of the Moulin-Shenker Rule," Discussion Paper 1998-06, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    2. Koster, M.A.L., 1998. "Multi-Service Serial Cost Sharing : A Characterization of the Moulin-Shenker Rule," Other publications TiSEM 4d029e40-e4e7-4f90-b963-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Jop Schouten & Mirjam GrooteSchaarsberg & Peter Borm, 2024. "Cost sharing methods for capacity restricted cooperative purchasing situations," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 28(2), pages 347-390, June.
    4. Yves Sprumont, 2010. "An Axiomatization of the Serial Cost-Sharing Method," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(5), pages 1711-1748, September.
    5. Hervé Moulin & Yves Sprumont, 2007. "Fair allocation of production externalities : recent results," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 117(1), pages 7-36.
    6. Jose A. García-Martínez & Ana Meca & G. Alexander Vergara, 2022. "Cooperative Purchasing with General Discount: A Game Theoretical Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-20, November.
    7. David E. Mills, 2017. "Buyer‐Induced Exclusive Dealing," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(1), pages 66-81, July.
    8. Friedman, Eric J., 2012. "Asymmetric Cost Sharing mechanisms," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 139-151.
    9. Eric Bahel & Christian Trudeau, 2018. "Consistency requirements and pattern methods in cost sharing problems with technological cooperation," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 47(3), pages 737-765, September.
    10. Watts, Alison, 2002. "Uniqueness of equilibrium in cost sharing games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 47-70, February.
    11. Wang, Yun-Tong & Zhu, Daxin, 2002. "Ordinal proportional cost sharing," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 215-230, May.
    12. Moulin, Herve, 2002. "Axiomatic cost and surplus sharing," Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, in: K. J. Arrow & A. K. Sen & K. Suzumura (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 6, pages 289-357, Elsevier.
    13. Jeon, Doh-Shin & Menicucci, Domenico, 2019. "On the unprofitability of buyer groups when sellers compete," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 265-288.
    14. Moulin, Herve & Sprumont, Yves, 2006. "Responsibility and cross-subsidization in cost sharing," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 152-188, April.
    15. Sprumont, Yves, 2000. "Coherent Cost-Sharing Rules," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 126-144, October.
    16. Yuxin Chen & Xinxin Li, 2013. "Group Buying Commitment and Sellers’ Competitive Advantages," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 164-183, March.
    17. Sprumont, Yves, 1998. "Ordinal Cost Sharing," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 126-162, July.
    18. Calvo, E. & Santos, J. C., 2001. "Prices in Mixed Cost Allocation Problems," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 243-258, November.
    19. EHLERS, Lars & WESTKAMP, Alexander, 2011. "Strategy-Proof Tie-Breaking," Cahiers de recherche 2011-07, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
    20. Eric Bahel & Christian Trudeau, 2013. "A discrete cost sharing model with technological cooperation," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 42(2), pages 439-460, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:14:y:2012:i:1:p:7-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.