IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v70y2024i12p8520-8540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational and Economic Obstacles to Automation: A Cautionary Tale from AT&T in the Twentieth Century

Author

Listed:
  • James Feigenbaum

    (Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215; National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138)

  • Daniel P. Gross

    (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138; Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)

Abstract

AT&T was the largest U.S. firm for most of the 20th century. Telephone operators once comprised more than 50% of its workforce, but in the late 1910s, it initiated a decades-long process of automating telephone operation with mechanical call switching—a technology invented in the 1880s. We study what drove AT&T to do so and why it took nearly a century. Interdependencies between call switching and nearly every other activity in AT&T’s business presented obstacles to change: Telephone operators were the fulcrum of a complex production system that had developed around them, and automation only began after the firm and new technology were adapted to work together. Even then, automatic switching was only profitable in larger markets—hence, diffusion expanded when the technology improved or service areas grew. The example suggests even narrowly defined tasks can be difficult to automate if they interact with many others.

Suggested Citation

  • James Feigenbaum & Daniel P. Gross, 2024. "Organizational and Economic Obstacles to Automation: A Cautionary Tale from AT&T in the Twentieth Century," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(12), pages 8520-8540, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:12:p:8520-8540
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.01760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01760
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01760?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:12:p:8520-8540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.