IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v51y2005i4p531-547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inventory Sharing and Rationing in Decentralized Dealer Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Zhao

    (Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907)

  • Vinayak Deshpande

    (Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907)

  • Jennifer K. Ryan

    (Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556)

Abstract

An increasing number of manufacturers have started to pursue a strategy that promotes inventory sharing among the dealers in their distribution network. In this paper we analyze a decentralized dealer network in which each independent dealer is given the flexibility to share his inventory. We model inventory sharing as a multiple demand classes problem in which each dealer faces his own customer demand with high priority, and inventory-sharing requests from other dealers with low priority. Assuming that each dealer uses a base-stock and threshold-rationing policy for his inventory-stocking and inventory-sharing decisions, we explicitly model the interactions between the dealers through inventory sharing and obtain a closed-form cost function for each dealer based on the steady-state distribution of the inventory levels at the two dealers. We then provide a detailed supermodularity analysis of the inventory-sharing and inventory-rationing game in which each dealer has a two-dimensional strategy set (stocking level and rationing level). We show that the full-sharing game (in which dealers precommit to sharing all of their on-hand inventory) and the fixed-sharing-level game (in which dealers precommit to sharing a portion of their on-hand inventory) are supermodular, and thus a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium is guaranteed to exist. For the rationing game (in which dealers precommit to their stocking levels), we show that there exists a dominant strategy equilibrium on the dealers' sharing (rationing) levels. Finally, a comprehensive computational study is conducted to highlight the impact of the manufacturer's incentives, subsidies, and/or transshipment fees on the dealers' sharing behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Zhao & Vinayak Deshpande & Jennifer K. Ryan, 2005. "Inventory Sharing and Rationing in Decentralized Dealer Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 531-547, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:51:y:2005:i:4:p:531-547
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0321
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0321?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur F. Veinott, 1965. "Optimal Policy in a Dynamic, Single Product, Nonstationary Inventory Model with Several Demand Classes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(5), pages 761-778, October.
    2. Albert Y. Ha, 1997. "Inventory Rationing in a Make-to-Stock Production System with Several Demand Classes and Lost Sales," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(8), pages 1093-1103, August.
    3. Hau Lee & Seungjin Whang, 1999. "Decentralized Multi-Echelon Supply Chains: Incentives and Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 633-640, May.
    4. Gérard P. Cachon & Paul H. Zipkin, 1999. "Competitive and Cooperative Inventory Policies in a Two-Stage Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(7), pages 936-953, July.
    5. Milgrom, Paul & Roberts, John, 1990. "Rationalizability, Learning, and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 58(6), pages 1255-1277, November.
    6. Ravi Anupindi & Yehuda Bassok & Eitan Zemel, 2001. "A General Framework for the Study of Decentralized Distribution Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 349-368, February.
    7. Nils Rudi & Sandeep Kapur & David F. Pyke, 2001. "A Two-Location Inventory Model with Transshipment and Local Decision Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(12), pages 1668-1680, December.
    8. Katia C. Frank & Rachel Q. Zhang & Izak Duenyas, 2003. "Optimal Policies for Inventory Systems with Priority Demand Classes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 993-1002, December.
    9. Gérard P. Cachon, 2001. "Stock Wars: Inventory Competition in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Multiple Retailers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(5), pages 658-674, October.
    10. Vinayak Deshpande & Morris A. Cohen & Karen Donohue, 2003. "A Threshold Inventory Rationing Policy for Service-Differentiated Demand Classes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 683-703, June.
    11. Hau L. Lee, 1987. "A Multi-Echelon Inventory Model for Repairable Items with Emergency Lateral Transshipments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(10), pages 1302-1316, October.
    12. Fernando Bernstein & Awi Federgruen, 2003. "Pricing and Replenishment Strategies in a Distribution System with Competing Retailers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 409-426, June.
    13. Steven Nahmias & W. Steven Demmy, 1981. "Operating Characteristics of an Inventory System with Rationing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(11), pages 1236-1245, November.
    14. Ravi Anupindi & Yehuda Bassok, 1999. "Centralization of Stocks: Retailers vs. Manufacturer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 178-191, February.
    15. Fangruo Chen & Awi Federgruen & Yu-Sheng Zheng, 2001. "Coordination Mechanisms for a Distribution System with One Supplier and Multiple Retailers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(5), pages 693-708, May.
    16. Steven A. Lippman & Kevin F. McCardle, 1997. "The Competitive Newsboy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 54-65, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Serguei Netessine & Nils Rudi, 2006. "Supply Chain Choice on the Internet," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 844-864, June.
    2. Güler, Kemal & Körpeoğlu, Evren & Şen, Alper, 2018. "Newsvendor competition under asymmetric cost information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 561-576.
    3. Refik Güllü & Geert-Jan van Houtum & F. Zeynep Sargut & Nesim Erkip, 2005. "Analysis of a Decentralized Supply Chain Under Partial Cooperation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 229-247, March.
    4. Lingxiu Dong & Erik Durbin, 2005. "Markets for surplus components with a strategic supplier," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(8), pages 734-753, December.
    5. Gérard P. Cachon, 2001. "Stock Wars: Inventory Competition in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Multiple Retailers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(5), pages 658-674, October.
    6. ElHafsi, Mohsen & Fang, Jianxin & Hamouda, Essia, 2021. "Optimal production and inventory control of multi-class mixed backorder and lost sales demand class models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 147-161.
    7. Yue Dai & Shu-Cherng Fang & Xiaoli Ling & Henry Nuttle, 2008. "Risk pooling strategy in a multi-echelon supply chain with price-sensitive demand," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 67(3), pages 391-421, June.
    8. Alfieri, Arianna & Pastore, Erica & Zotteri, Giulio, 2017. "Dynamic inventory rationing: How to allocate stock according to managerial priorities. An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 14-29.
    9. Karin T. Möllering & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2008. "An optimal critical level policy for inventory systems with two demand classes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(7), pages 632-642, October.
    10. Ravi Anupindi & Yehuda Bassok & Eitan Zemel, 2001. "A General Framework for the Study of Decentralized Distribution Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 349-368, February.
    11. Samii, Amir-Behzad & Pibernik, Richard & Yadav, Prashant, 2011. "An inventory reservation problem with nesting and fill rate-based performance measures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 393-402, September.
    12. Fernando Bernstein & Fangruo Chen & Awi Federgruen, 2006. "Coordinating Supply Chains with Simple Pricing Schemes: The Role of Vendor-Managed Inventories," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(10), pages 1483-1492, October.
    13. Seifert, Ralf W. & Thonemann, Ulrich W. & Sieke, Marcel A., 2006. "Integrating direct and indirect sales channels under decentralized decision-making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 209-229, September.
    14. Tan, Tarkan & Güllü, Refik & Erkip, Nesim, 2009. "Using imperfect advance demand information in ordering and rationing decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 665-677, October.
    15. Quan-Lin Li & Yi-Meng Li & Jing-Yu Ma & Heng-Li Liu, 2023. "A complete algebraic solution to the optimal dynamic rationing policy in the stock-rationing queue with two demand classes," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 1-54, April.
    16. Gabor, A.F. & van Vianen, L.A. & Yang, G. & Axsäter, S., 2016. "Enabling customer satisfaction and stock reduction through service differentiation with response time guarantees," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-13, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    17. Hasan Arslan & Stephen C. Graves & Thomas A. Roemer, 2007. "A Single-Product Inventory Model for Multiple Demand Classes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(9), pages 1486-1500, September.
    18. FadIloglu, Mehmet Murat & Bulut, Önder, 2010. "A dynamic rationing policy for continuous-review inventory systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 675-685, May.
    19. Moon, Ilkyeong & Feng, Xuehao, 2017. "Supply chain coordination with a single supplier and multiple retailers considering customer arrival times and route selection," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 78-97.
    20. Nils Rudi & Sandeep Kapur & David F. Pyke, 2001. "A Two-Location Inventory Model with Transshipment and Local Decision Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(12), pages 1668-1680, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:51:y:2005:i:4:p:531-547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.