IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v47y2001i11p1539-1551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Operating Policies for Multiplant Stochastic Manufacturing Systems in a Changing Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Lode Li

    (Yale School of Management, P. O. Box 208200, New Haven, Connecticut 06520)

  • Evan L. Porteus

    (Graduate School of Business, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Hongtao Zhang

    (Department of Information and Systems Management, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

Abstract

This paper addresses the horizontal coordination between production units located in different countries within a supply chain in a changing environment. The model incorporates (1) congestion and delay through uncertainties in demand and processing times, (2) a changing production cost environment through uncertainty in an environmental state (such as the exchange rate), and (3) allowing production to stock. The main contribution of the paper is to characterize the optimal production policy, assuming no switchover cost, as a barrier-type control policy for a series of models. For each plant, there is a barrier function defined on the environmental state that gives the total worldwide stock level barrier: This plant should be operated if and only if the stock level is below this barrier. The authors also show that, in a simple setting of two plants in different countries, the barrier functions are not always monotone in the exchange rate even when the production costs are. The authors present a condition under which the control barriers are shown to be monotone. Under this condition and with only two plants, it is optimal to follow a primary/secondary plant policy in which, given a fixed environmental state, it is optimal to operate both plants when stock is low, only the primary plant when stock is moderate, and neither when stock is high. Furthermore, the roles of the plants switch as the environmental state passes through the equal production cost state. In addition, the firm seeks to carry the most stock as a hedge against future environmental state moves, when one plant is significantly cheaper than the other. The firm seeks to carry the least stock when both plants are equally costly to operate.

Suggested Citation

  • Lode Li & Evan L. Porteus & Hongtao Zhang, 2001. "Optimal Operating Policies for Multiplant Stochastic Manufacturing Systems in a Changing Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(11), pages 1539-1551, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:47:y:2001:i:11:p:1539-1551
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.47.11.1539.10251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.11.1539.10251
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.47.11.1539.10251?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard F. Serfozo, 1979. "Technical Note—An Equivalence Between Continuous and Discrete Time Markov Decision Processes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 616-620, June.
    2. Lode Li, 1988. "A Stochastic Theory of the Firm," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 447-466, August.
    3. Lode Li, 1992. "The Role of Inventory in Delivery-Time Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 182-197, February.
    4. Morris A. Cohen & Suman Mallik, 1997. "Global Supply Chains: Research And Applications," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 6(3), pages 193-210, September.
    5. Phillip J. Lederer & Lode Li, 1997. "Pricing, Production, Scheduling, and Delivery-Time Competition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 407-420, June.
    6. Lode Li & Yew Sing Lee, 1994. "Pricing and Delivery-Time Performance in a Competitive Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(5), pages 633-646, May.
    7. Arnd Huchzermeier & Morris A. Cohen, 1996. "Valuing Operational Flexibility Under Exchange Rate Risk," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 100-113, February.
    8. Sriram Dasu & Lode Li, 1997. "Optimal Operating Policies in the Presence of Exchange Rate Variability," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(5), pages 705-722, May.
    9. Bruce Kogut & Nalin Kulatilaka, 1994. "Operating Flexibility, Global Manufacturing, and the Option Value of a Multinational Network," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 123-139, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tang, Ou & Nurmaya Musa, S., 2011. "Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 25-34, September.
    2. Szmerekovsky, Joseph G., 2007. "Single machine scheduling under market uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 163-175, February.
    3. Guang Xiao & Nan Yang & Renyu Zhang, 2015. "Dynamic Pricing and Inventory Management Under Fluctuating Procurement Costs," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 321-334, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Murat Erkoc & Huaqing Wang & Anas Ahmed, 2018. "Price Competition with Geometric Brownian motion in Exchange Rate Uncertainty," Papers 1804.08153, arXiv.org.
    2. Jiao Wang & Lima Zhao & Arnd Huchzermeier, 2021. "Operations‐Finance Interface in Risk Management: Research Evolution and Opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 355-389, February.
    3. Vishal Gaur & Sridhar Seshadri, 2005. "Hedging Inventory Risk Through Market Instruments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 103-120, April.
    4. Xiuli Chao & Frank Y. Chen, 2005. "An Optimal Production and Shutdown Strategy when a Supplier Offers an Incentive Program," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 130-143, March.
    5. Nagesh N. Murthy & Milind Shrikhande & Ajay Subramanian, 2007. "Switching costs, dynamic uncertainty, and buyer–seller relationships," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(8), pages 859-873, December.
    6. Lampón, Jesús F., 2019. "Relocation in conditions of uncertainty: the Spanish automobile components industry during the economic crisis (2008-2012)," MPRA Paper 92738, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Jesús F. Lampón, 2020. "The impact of uncertainty on production relocation: Implications from a regional perspective," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(3), pages 427-446, June.
    8. Burak Kazaz & Maqbool Dada & Herbert Moskowitz, 2005. "Global Production Planning Under Exchange-Rate Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(7), pages 1101-1119, July.
    9. So, Kut C. & Song, Jing-Sheng, 1998. "Price, delivery time guarantees and capacity selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 28-49, November.
    10. Krishnan S. Anand & M. Faz{i}l Paç & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2011. "Quality-Speed Conundrum: Trade-offs in Customer-Intensive Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 40-56, January.
    11. Liming Liu & Mahmut Parlar & Stuart X. Zhu, 2007. "Pricing and Lead Time Decisions in Decentralized Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 713-725, May.
    12. Weixin Shang & Liming Liu, 2011. "Promised Delivery Time and Capacity Games in Time-Based Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 599-610, March.
    13. Gérard P. Cachon & Patrick T. Harker, 2002. "Competition and Outsourcing with Scale Economies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(10), pages 1314-1333, October.
    14. Vernon N. Hsu & Kaijie Zhu, 2011. "Tax-Effective Supply Chain Decisions Under China's Export-Oriented Tax Policies," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 163-179, November.
    15. Stephen M. Gilbert & Z. Kevin Weng, 1998. "Incentive Effects Favor Nonconsolidating Queues in a Service System: The Principal--Agent Perspective," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-1), pages 1662-1669, December.
    16. Li, Shanling & Wang, Letian, 2010. "Outsourcing and capacity planning in an uncertain global environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 131-141, November.
    17. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    18. Jesús F. Lampón & Pablo Cabanelas-Lorenzo & Santiago Lago-Peñas, 2013. "Why firms relocate their production overseas? The answer lies inside: corporate, logistic and technological determinants," Working Papers 2013/3, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    19. Jesús F. Lampón & Pablo Cabanelas-Lorenzo & Santiago Lago-Peñas, 2013. "Why firms relocate their production overseas? The answer lies inside: corporate, logistic and technological determinants," Working Papers 2013/3, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    20. Meijboom, Bert & Obel, Børge, 2007. "Tactical coordination in a multi-location and multi-stage operations structure: A model and a pharmaceutical company case," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 258-273, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:47:y:2001:i:11:p:1539-1551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.