IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v43y1997i2p251-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Note. Optimal Promotion Strategies: A Demand-Sided Characterization

Author

Listed:
  • Duncan Simester

    (Graduate School of Business, The University of Chicago, 1101 East 58th St., Chicago, Illinois 60637)

Abstract

We generalize Narasimhan's (Narasimhan, Chakravarthi. 1988. Competitive promotional strategies. J. Bus. 61(4) 427--449.) model of retail promotion to include multiple products and general demand functions. Doing so allows us to further characterize optimal promotion strategies. We find that firms prefer to offer deeper promotions on products for which switching customers have stronger demand than loyal customers and/or for which the price sensitivity of demand is high for both switching and loyal customers. We further show that firms will offer deeper promotions on products which enjoy complementary relationships with other products that they sell rather than on products for which the firm sells a substitute.

Suggested Citation

  • Duncan Simester, 1997. "Note. Optimal Promotion Strategies: A Demand-Sided Characterization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 251-256, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:43:y:1997:i:2:p:251-256
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.43.2.251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.2.251
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.43.2.251?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandro Shelegia & Chris M. Wilson, 2014. "A Utility-Based Model of Sales with Informative Advertising," Vienna Economics Papers vie1406, University of Vienna, Department of Economics.
    2. Zhili Zhou & Yongpei Guan, 2013. "Two-stage stochastic lot-sizing problem under cost uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 209(1), pages 207-230, October.
    3. In, Younghwan & Wright, Julian, 2014. "Loss-leader pricing and upgrades," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 19-22.
    4. Rajiv Lal & J. Miguel Villas-Boas, 1998. "Price Promotions and Trade Deals with Multiproduct Retailers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(7), pages 935-949, July.
    5. Maxim Sinitsyn, 2012. "Coordination of Price Promotions in Complementary Categories," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(11), pages 2076-2094, November.
    6. Bing Jing & Zhong Wen, 2008. "Finitely Loyal Customers, Switchers, and Equilibrium Price Promotion," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(3), pages 683-707, September.
    7. Sandro Shelegia & Chris M Wilson, 2014. "A Utility-Based Model of Sales with Informative Advertising," Discussion Paper Series 2014_09, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, revised Oct 2014.
    8. Yuxin Chen & Chakravarthi Narasimhan & Z. John Zhang, 2001. "Consumer Heterogeneity and Competitive Price-Matching Guarantees," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 300-314, June.
    9. Junhyun Bae & Li Chen & Shiqing Yao, 2022. "Service Capacity and Price Promotion Wars," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8757-8772, December.
    10. Maxim Sinitsyn, 2016. "Managing Price Promotions Within a Product Line," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 304-318, March.
    11. Lee Sang-Yong T. & Png Ivan P.L., 2004. "Buyer Shopping Costs and Retail Pricing: An Indirect Empirical Test," Review of Marketing Science, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Hao Lan & Tim Lloyd & Wyn Morgan & Paul W. Dobson, 2022. "Are food price promotions predictable? The hazard function of supermarket discounts," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 64-85, February.
    13. Jorge M. Silva-Risso & Randolph E. Bucklin & Donald G. Morrison, 1999. "A Decision Support System for Planning Manufacturers' Sales Promotion Calendars," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 274-300.
    14. Kyungmin Choi & Sunghan Ryu & Daegon Cho, 2019. "When a loss becomes a gain: different effects of substitute versus complementary loss leaders in a multi-sided platform," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 681-691, December.
    15. Sridhar Moorthy & Yongmin Chen & Shervin Shahrokhi Tehrani, 2018. "Selling Your Product Through Competitors’ Outlets: Channel Strategy When Consumers Comparison Shop," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 138-152, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:43:y:1997:i:2:p:251-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.