IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v38y1992i9p1245-1263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Analysis of Activity Networks Under Generalized Precedence Relations (GPRs)

Author

Listed:
  • Salah E. Elmaghraby

    (Graduate Program in Operations Research, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7913)

  • Jerzy Kamburowski

    (Department of Information Systems and Operations Management, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606-3390)

Abstract

We present a model for activity networks under generalized precedence relations (GPRs), discuss its temporal analysis and the issues that may arise relative to inconsistency among the specified relations and the activity durations. We also give more precise definition to the concept of criticality of an activity, and introduce the new concept of flexibility of an activity which is akin to the traditional concept of activity floats in regular CPM, with the latter taking on different meaning from its common interpretation in standard CPM. Issues of optimization are raised when one assumes, for each activity, a piecewise-linear time-cost function that permits positive and negative deviations from its least-cost duration between specified lower and upper bounds on that duration. We seek the optimal activity durations subject to the specified GPRs and a given due date \lambda . We also seek the construction of the complete project duration-cost function between the project minimum duration and its least-cost duration when the due date \lambda is interpreted, first, as a "deadline" and, second, as a "target date" with rewards for early, and penalties for late completion. The relations between the problems posed and the uncapacitated minimum cost flow problems are revealed and are utilized in the algorithmic solution of the problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Salah E. Elmaghraby & Jerzy Kamburowski, 1992. "The Analysis of Activity Networks Under Generalized Precedence Relations (GPRs)," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(9), pages 1245-1263, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:38:y:1992:i:9:p:1245-1263
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.38.9.1245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.38.9.1245
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.38.9.1245?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. De Reyck, Bert & Herroelen, Willy, 1999. "The multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem with generalized precedence relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 538-556, December.
    2. Vanhoucke, Mario, 2005. "New computational results for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem with time-switch constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 359-374, September.
    3. Simon Micheler & Yee Mey Goh & Niels Lohse, 2021. "A transformation of human operation approach to inform system design for automation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 201-220, January.
    4. Mashood Ishaque & Abbas K. Zaidi & Alexander H. Levis, 2009. "Project management using point graphs," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 36-54, March.
    5. Wiesemann, Wolfram & Kuhn, Daniel & Rustem, Berç, 2010. "Maximizing the net present value of a project under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 356-367, April.
    6. Jorgensen, Trond & Wallace, Stein W., 2000. "Improving project cost estimation by taking into account managerial flexibility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 239-251, December.
    7. George L. Vairaktarakis, 2003. "The Value of Resource Flexibility in the Resource-Constrained Job Assignment Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 718-732, June.
    8. Bianco, Lucio & Caramia, Massimiliano & Giordani, Stefano, 2022. "Project scheduling with generalized precedence relations: A new method to analyze criticalities and flexibilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 451-462.
    9. Elmaghraby, Salah E., 1995. "Activity nets: A guided tour through some recent developments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 383-408, May.
    10. De Reyck, Bert & Herroelen, willy, 1998. "A branch-and-bound procedure for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem with generalized precedence relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 152-174, November.
    11. Kalczynski, Pawel Jan & Kamburowski, Jerzy, 2007. "On no-wait and no-idle flow shops with makespan criterion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(3), pages 677-685, May.
    12. Caramia, Massimiliano & Guerriero, Francesca, 2011. "A note on the modelling of project networks with time constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 666-670, June.
    13. Dodin, Bajis & Elimam, A. A., 1997. "Audit scheduling with overlapping activities and sequence-dependent setup costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 22-33, February.
    14. Weglarz, Jan & Józefowska, Joanna & Mika, Marek & Waligóra, Grzegorz, 2011. "Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes - A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 177-205, February.
    15. Ulrich Dorndorf & Erwin Pesch & Toàn Phan-Huy, 2000. "A Time-Oriented Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling with Generalised Precedence Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(10), pages 1365-1384, October.
    16. Inayat Ullah & Dunbing Tang & Qi Wang & Leilei Yin, 2017. "Least Risky Change Propagation Path Analysis in Product Design Process," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 379-391, July.
    17. Chung-Lun Li & Nicholas G. Hall, 2019. "Work Package Sizing and Project Performance," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 123-142, January.
    18. Pinker, Edieal & Szmerekovsky, Joseph & Tilson, Vera, 2014. "On the complexity of project scheduling to minimize exposed time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 448-453.
    19. Nicole Megow & Rolf H. Möhring & Jens Schulz, 2011. "Decision Support and Optimization in Shutdown and Turnaround Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 189-204, May.
    20. He, Zhengwen & Wang, Nengmin & Jia, Tao & Xu, Yu, 2009. "Simulated annealing and tabu search for multi-mode project payment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 688-696, November.
    21. Levner, Eugene & Zuckerman, Dror & Meirovich, Gavriel, 1998. "Total quality management of a production-maintenance system: A network approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 407-421, September.
    22. Lucio Bianco & Massimiliano Caramia & Stefano Giordani & Alessio Salvatore, 2024. "Scheduling activities in project network with feeding precedence relations: an earliest start forward recursion algorithm," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 193-224, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:38:y:1992:i:9:p:1245-1263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.