IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v32y1986i5p622-642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Virtual Positions and Power

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth D. Mackenzie

    (Mackenzie and Company, Inc., P.O. Box 1118, Lawrence, Kansas 66044 and School of Business, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-4500)

Abstract

This paper discusses a class of natural organizational phenomena called virtual positions and links them to the enactment of power. Virtual positions involve three or more persons from different parts of an organization working together on a recurring (and usually major) task process. A virtual position is contrasted to a regular position in which an incumbent performs a set of task processes. There is no regular position for the task processes performed by a virtual position. Instead the set of individuals act as if they are a composite position. There are two types of virtual positions: regulated and unregulated. Regulated virtual positions usually take the form of committees, standing committees, and task forces. Unregulated virtual positions involve task processes which have been neither rationalized nor integrated with the Organizational Architecture. Virtual positions arise out of attempts to cope with organizational changes without having to redesign the organization. Given enough time a virtual position can be used to analyze change and to determine how it should be handled. But when changes occur at a more rapid rate than the virtual positions can be absorbed, they can spread rapidly. Thus an informal adaptive mechanism can lead to an accumulation of problems which can become maladaptive. Each virtual position involves the control of some task process and the possible leverage of this task process on others. Each virtual position participant has opportunity for access to information, other persons, and the possibility of enhancing his own position or preventing the enhancement of another's. When the virtual position involves major, recurring vulnerabilities, this control can be parlayed into organizational power. Virtual positions are viewed as arenas for power struggles in organizations. An example is given of the virtual positions in an actual community bank. The theory underlying the virtual positions is based on the continuing evolution of a theory of group structures. The concepts of process and task process are defined. A recently developed operationalization of the concept of interdependence is introduced. The notion of uncertainty is generalized. This leads to the development of uncertainty interdependence. Power is seen as the control of uncertainty interdependence. Virtual positions are viewed as the arenas in which uncertainty interdependencies can be resolved. Thus virtual positions are linked to the distribution and enactment of power in organizations. The theoretical discussion is based on a technology which is used in organizational design. Consequently, there exist means by which virtual positions can be identified and analyzed in real organizations. This paper links these analyses of virtual positions to the process of designing an organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth D. Mackenzie, 1986. "Virtual Positions and Power," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 622-642, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:32:y:1986:i:5:p:622-642
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.622
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.622?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brown, Carol V., 2003. "Linking intra-organizational stakeholders ; CIO perspectives on the use of coordination mechanisms," Working papers no. 304, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    2. Karen Stephenson, 1995. "The Formation and Incorporation of Virtual Entrepreneurial Groups," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 19(3), pages 35-52, April.
    3. Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2007. "On the concept of decision aiding process: an operational perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 3-27, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:32:y:1986:i:5:p:622-642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.