IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v30y1984i11p1301-1310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiattribute Nonlinear Utility Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Peter C. Fishburn

    (AT&T Bell Laboratories, Inc., Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974)

Abstract

Independence axioms similar to those proposed for multiattribute von Neumann--Morgenstern linear utility theory are examined in the context of new nonlinear utility theories developed by Chew and MacCrimmon, and Fishburn. These new theories weaken the independence axiom of von Neumann and Morgenstern, and Fishburn's theory does not require preferences to be transitive. The paper shows that axioms for independence between attributes lead to decompositions of utility for the nonlinear theories that are related to standard decompositions for linear utility.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter C. Fishburn, 1984. "Multiattribute Nonlinear Utility Theory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(11), pages 1301-1310, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:30:y:1984:i:11:p:1301-1310
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.30.11.1301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.11.1301
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.30.11.1301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gebhard Geiger, 2012. "Multi-attribute non-expected utility," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 263-292, July.
    2. Mehrez, Abraham, 1997. "The interface between OR/MS and decision theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 38-47, May.
    3. Bertrand Munier, 2001. "Risk Attitudes Appraisal and Cognitive Coordination in Decentralized Decision Systems," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 141-158, March.
    4. Han Bleichrodt & Ulrich Schmidt & Horst Zank, 2009. "Additive Utility in Prospect Theory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 863-873, May.
    5. He, Ying & Huang, Rui-Hua, 2008. "Risk attributes theory: Decision making under risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 243-260, April.
    6. Dogucan Mazicioglu & Jason R. W. Merrick, 2018. "Behavioral Modeling of Adversaries with Multiple Objectives in Counterterrorism," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 962-977, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:30:y:1984:i:11:p:1301-1310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.