IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v25y2006i5p538-542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comment on “Is Having More Channels Really Better? A Model of Competition Among Commercial Television Broadcasters”

Author

Listed:
  • Shan-Yu Chou

    (Department of Business Administration, National Taiwan University, 1 Section 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 106, Taiwan, Republic of China)

  • Chi-Cheng Wu

    (Department of Business Management, National Sun Yat-Sen University, 70 Lianhai Road, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan, Republic of China)

Abstract

This paper shows that the analysis of Liu et al. (2004) contains a substantive error—the asserted pure-strategy Nash equilibrium leading to their Theorems 1 and 2 is really not an equilibrium. We show that in their model, either pure-strategy Nash equilibria do not exist or, unlike their asserted main result, when a pure-strategy equilibrium exists, increasing the number of commercial television broadcasters does not result in lower-quality programs. Possible modifications of Liu et al.'s model that may help restore the desired result are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Shan-Yu Chou & Chi-Cheng Wu, 2006. "A Comment on “Is Having More Channels Really Better? A Model of Competition Among Commercial Television Broadcasters”," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 538-542, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:25:y:2006:i:5:p:538-542
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1050.0183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0183
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.1050.0183?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp & Vincent R. Nijs & Dominique M. Hanssens & Marnik G. Dekimpe, 2005. "Competitive Reactions to Advertising and Promotion Attacks," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 35-54, September.
    2. Yong Liu & Daniel S. Putler & Charles B. Weinberg, 2004. "Is Having More Channels Really Better? A Model of Competition Among Commercial Television Broadcasters," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 120-133, July.
    3. Esther Gal-Or & Mordechai Gal-Or, 2005. "Customized Advertising via a Common Media Distributor," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 241-253, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yong Liu & Daniel S. Putler & Charles B. Weinberg, 2006. "A Reply to “A Comment on ‘Is Having More Channels Really Better? A Model of Competition Among Commercial Television Broadcasters' ”," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 543-546, September.
    2. Hans Jarle Kind & Tore Nilssen & Lars Sørgard, 2009. "Business Models for Media Firms: Does Competition Matter for How They Raise Revenue?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1112-1128, 11-12.
    3. David Godes & Elie Ofek & Miklos Sarvary, 2009. "Content vs. Advertising: The Impact of Competition on Media Firm Strategy," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 20-35, 01-02.
    4. Fabio Caldieraro, 2016. "The Role of Brand Image and Product Characteristics on Firms’ Entry and OEM Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(11), pages 3327-3350, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharon Horsky, 2006. "The Changing Architecture of Advertising Agencies," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 367-383, 07-08.
    2. Anderson, Simon P. & Foros, Øystein & Kind, Hans Jarle, 2012. "Product quality, competition, and multi-purchasing," Discussion Papers 2012/9, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    3. Gijsenberg, Maarten & Nijs, Vincent R., 2018. "Advertising Timing," Research Report 2018004-MARK, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    4. ter Braak, Anne & Geyskens, Inge & Dekimpe, Marnik G., 2014. "Taking private labels upmarket: Empirical generalizations on category drivers of premium private label introductions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 125-140.
    5. Jee, Teck Weng, 2021. "The perception of discount sales promotions – A utilitarian and hedonic perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    6. Leonidas A. Zampetakis & Melina Vekini & Vassilis Moustakis, 2009. "Entrepreneurial orientation, access to financial resources, and product performance in the Greek commercial TV industry," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 897-910, April.
    7. Yenipazarli, Arda, 2024. "Strategic incentives for comparative advertising investments in non-zero-sum competition and economic consequences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 1059-1073.
    8. Olga M. Khessina & Samira Reis, 2016. "The Limits of Reflected Glory: The Beneficial and Harmful Effects of Product Name Similarity in the U.S. Network TV Program Industry, 1944–2003," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 411-427, April.
    9. Volpe, Richard J., III, 2011. "Evaluating the Performance of U.S. Supermarkets: Pricing Strategies, Competition from Hypermarkets, and Private Labels," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Bing Jing, 2006. "On the Profitability of Firms in a Differentiated Industry," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 248-259, 05-06.
    11. M.G. Dekimpe & D.M. Hanssens, 2005. "Persistence Models and Marketing Strategy," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(5), pages 855-884.
    12. Lu, Huidi & van der Lans, Ralf & Helsen, Kristiaan & Gauri, Dinesh K., 2023. "DEPART: Decomposing prices using atheoretical regression trees," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 781-800.
    13. Csilla Horváth & Dennis Fok, 2013. "Moderating Factors of Immediate, Gross, and Net Cross-Brand Effects of Price Promotions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 127-152, July.
    14. Nobuhiko Terui & Wirawan Dony Dahana, 2006. "Research Note—Estimating Heterogeneous Price Thresholds," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 384-391, 07-08.
    15. Holtrop, Niels & Wieringa, Jakob & Gijsenberg, Maarten & Stern, P., 2016. "Competitive reactions to personal selling," Research Report 16004-MARK, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    16. Chan, Tat Y. & Narasimhan, Chakravarthi & Yoon, Yeujun, 2017. "Advertising and price competition in a manufacturer-retailer channel," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 694-716.
    17. Makoto Mizuno & Hideaki Aoyama & Yoshi Fujiwara, 2020. "Untangling the complexity of market competition in consumer goods -A complex Hilbert PCA analysis," Papers 2008.11327, arXiv.org.
    18. Anna D'Annunzio, 2013. "Vertical Integration in Two-Sided Markets: Exclusive Provision and Program Quality," DIAG Technical Reports 2013-16, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    19. Bogomolova, Svetlana & Dunn, Steven & Trinh, Giang & Taylor, Jennifer & Volpe, Richard J., 2015. "Price promotion landscape in the US and UK: Depicting retail practice to inform future research agenda," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-11.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:25:y:2006:i:5:p:538-542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.