IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v18y1999i3p455-457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commentary on “Industrial Pricing: Theory and Mangerial Practice”

Author

Listed:
  • George E. Cressman , Jr.

    (Strategic Pricing Group, Inc., 65 Boston Post Road West, Marlborough, Massachusetts 01752)

Abstract

Noble and Gruca (1999, this issue) provide useful insights into the pricing practices managers employ. Their findings indicate managerial pricing practices are heavily dominated by internal, cost-based approaches. Particularly relevant is the absence of value-based pricing practices. Noble and Gruca's findings indicate that the emerging market orientation work has not connected to pricing practice. This work poses a significant challenge for marketing theoreticians and educators: How can managers be helped to move beyond internally focused to externally-customer-focused pricing practice?

Suggested Citation

  • George E. Cressman , Jr., 1999. "Commentary on “Industrial Pricing: Theory and Mangerial Practice”," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 455-457.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:18:y:1999:i:3:p:455-457
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.18.3.455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.18.3.455
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.18.3.455?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter M. Noble & Thomas S. Gruca, 1999. "Response to the Comments on “Industrial Pricing: Theory and Managerial Practice”," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 458-459.
    2. Peter M. Noble & Thomas S. Gruca, 1999. "Industrial Pricing: Theory and Managerial Practice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 435-454.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Murthy, D.N.P. & Hagmark, P.-E. & Virtanen, S., 2009. "Product variety and reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1601-1608.
    2. Cruijssen, F. & Borm, P.E.M. & Fleuren, H.A. & Hamers, H.J.M., 2005. "Insinking : A Methodology to Exploit Synergy in Transportation," Other publications TiSEM 958be918-e7b4-4e46-9cbe-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Ludwig von Auer & Mark Trede, 2018. "Markets with technological progress: pricing, quality, and novelty," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 124(2), pages 121-137, June.
    4. Ronald B. Larson, 2019. "Promoting demand-based pricing," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(1), pages 42-51, February.
    5. Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Janice E. Carrillo, 2017. "Strategic Analysis of the Agency Model for Digital Goods," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 724-741, April.
    6. Oseni, Musiliu O. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2017. "The prospects for smart energy prices: Observations from 50 years of residential pricing for fixed line telecoms and electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 150-160.
    7. Srinivas, Sharan & Ramachandiran, Surya & Rajendran, Suchithra, 2022. "Autonomous robot-driven deliveries: A review of recent developments and future directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    8. Sinha, Avik, 2015. "Conceptualizing Service Export Price Optimization," MPRA Paper 102264, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2015.
    9. Fuxiao Lu & Guowei Liu & Jianxiong Zhang & Wansheng Tang, 2016. "Benefits of partial myopia in a durable product supply chain considering pricing and advertising," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(10), pages 1309-1324, October.
    10. J. B. G. Frenk & Canan Pehlivan & Semih O. Sezer, 2019. "Order and exit decisions under non-increasing price curves for products with short life cycles," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 90(3), pages 365-397, December.
    11. Florian Steinbrenner & Jana Turčínková, 2021. "Industry-Specific Factors Impeding the Implementation of Value-Based Pricing," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 27-46.
    12. Markus Christen, 2005. "Research Note---Cost Uncertainty Is Bliss: The Effect of Competition on the Acquisition of Cost Information for Pricing New Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 668-676, April.
    13. Bergers, Dominic, 2022. "The status quo bias and its individual differences from a price management perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Li, Feng & Du, Timon C. & Wei, Ying, 2020. "Enhancing supply chain decisions with consumers’ behavioral factors: An illustration of decoy effect," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    15. Hallberg, Niklas L., 2017. "The micro-foundations of pricing strategy in industrial markets: A case study in the European packaging industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 179-188.
    16. Weihua Zhou & Tiantian Lin & Gangshu (George) Cai, 2020. "Guarantor Financing in a Four‐Party Supply Chain Game with Leadership Influence," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(9), pages 2035-2056, September.
    17. Yu, Yugang & Wang, Bo & Zheng, Shengming, 2024. "Data-driven product design and assortment optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    18. John Aloysius & Cary Deck & Amy Farmer, 2012. "A Comparison of Bundling and Sequential Pricing in Competitive Markets: Experimental Evidence," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 25-51, February.
    19. Shailender Singh & Hawati Janor, 2013. "An Empirical Study on Pricing Methods Adopted by SMEs with Different Ownership Structure," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 14(2), pages 315-327, June.
    20. Stuart Read & Stefan Michel & Jan H. Schumann & Kumar Rakesh Ranjan, 2019. "Pricing co-created value: an integrative framework and research agenda," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 155-183, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:18:y:1999:i:3:p:455-457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.