IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orited/v17y2017i3p93-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Big Should My Dot Be? Using Spreadsheet Simulation to Evaluate Process Improvement Data Collection Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Keith A. Willoughby

    (Department of Finance and Management Science, Edwards School of Business, University of Saskatchewan, 25 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK Canada S7N 5A7)

  • Gary F. Teare

    (Saskatchewan Health Quality Council, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 3R2 Canada)

Abstract

Occasionally, healthcare professionals approach analytical topics and courses with a blend of fear and loathing. They may fail to grasp the connection between particular principles and their application to actual process analysis and improvement. The run chart is a persuasively powerful quantitative tool. Healthcare teams could use this tool to better comprehend the extent of process changes over time. Although constructing the run chart is mathematically simple, healthcare professionals may be uncertain as to sample size sufficiency. They may also be unsure of the number of observations required in run chart subgroups. We developed a spreadsheet simulation model to provide enhanced relevance for the topic of run chart subgroup size determination. This classroom-tested active learning exercise helps healthcare teams to visually understand the relationships between subgroup size, underlying process variation, and anticipated levels of improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Keith A. Willoughby & Gary F. Teare, 2017. "How Big Should My Dot Be? Using Spreadsheet Simulation to Evaluate Process Improvement Data Collection Strategies," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 93-98, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:17:y:2017:i:3:p:93-98
    DOI: 10.1287/ited.2016.0160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2016.0160
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ited.2016.0160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weiyu Tsai & Don G. Wardell, 2006. "An Interactive Excel VBA Example for Teaching Statistics Concepts," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 125-135, September.
    2. Howard R. Clayton & Chetan S. Sankar, 2009. "Using Spreadsheets to Enhance Learning in the Affective Domain for Undergraduate Statistics Students," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 10-17, September.
    3. Thomas A. Grossman, 2006. "Integrating Spreadsheet Engineering in a Management Science Course: A Hierarchical Approach," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 18-36, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ganesh, Gopala & Paswan, Audhesh K., 2010. "Teaching basic marketing accountability using spreadsheets: An exploratory perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 182-190, February.
    2. Jason Amaral & Dorothea Kuettner, 2008. "Analyzing Supply Chains at HP Using Spreadsheet Models," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 228-240, August.
    3. John Miltenburg, 2019. "Online Teaching in a Large, Required, Undergraduate Management Science Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 89-104, January.
    4. Julie Ann Stuart Williams & Randall Reid & Kristine Gallamore & Maxwell Rankin, 2018. "Introducing Troubleshooting for Model Formulation, Spreadsheet Development, and Memo Communication with Feedforward," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 102-115, January.
    5. W. J. Hurley & Mathieu Balez, 2008. "A Spreadsheet Implementation of an Ammunition Requirements Planning Model for the Canadian Army," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 271-280, August.
    6. LeBlanc, Larry J. & Grossman, Thomas A. & Bartolacci, Michael R., 2019. "Ensuring scalability and reusability of spreadsheet linear programming models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 55-69.
    7. Natalie M. Scala & Stella Tomasi & Andrea Goncher & Karen M. Bursic, 2018. "Motivation and Analytics: Comparing Business and Engineering Students," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 1-11, September.
    8. Sarah G. Nurre & Jeffery D. Weir, 2017. "Interactive Excel-Based Gantt Chart Schedule Builder," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 49-57, January.
    9. Thomas A. Grossman & Vijay Mehrotra & Mouwafac Sidaoui, 2016. "A Student-Centered Approach to the Business School Management Science Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 42-53, January.
    10. Donald D. Conant, 2015. "Developing a Scalable Model to Analyze Expanding Data Sets," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 215-223, May.
    11. Vinay Ramani & Jyotirmoy Dalal & Swami Dayakarananda, 2023. "Case Article—GAP: A Humanitarian Initiative of Ramakrishna Mission for Underprivileged Children," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 70-75, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:17:y:2017:i:3:p:93-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.