IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v7y1996i4p400-408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Robey

    (Georgia State University, College of Business Administration, Atlanta, Georgia 30303)

Abstract

This paper confirms the evidence of diversity in information systems (IS) research and identifies the ways in which diversity both threatens and advances the field of IS. While advocating diversity within the field of IS, the paper also discusses the responsibilities that must be assumed by IS researchers. Responsibilities include a “disciplined methodological pluralism” (Landry and Banville [Landry, M., C. Banville. 1992. A disciplined methodological pluralism for MIS research. Accounting, Management and Inform. Technologies 2 (2, April--June) 77--97.) in which researchers clearly justify their research aims, theories, and methods. Responsibilities also include researchers’ commitment to collaborative ideals.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Robey, 1996. "Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 400-408, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:7:y:1996:i:4:p:400-408
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.7.4.400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.4.400
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.7.4.400?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goles, Tim & Hirschheim, Rudy, 2000. "The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead...long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 249-268, June.
    2. Roberts, Robin W. & Wallace, Dana M., 2015. "Sustaining diversity in social and environmental accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 78-87.
    3. Schauer, Carola, 2007. "Relevance and success of IS teaching and research: An analysis of the "Relevance Debate"," ICB Research Reports 19, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB).
    4. Erastus Karanja & Aditya Sharma & Ibrahim Salama, 2020. "What does MIS survey research reveal about diversity and representativeness in the MIS field? A content analysis approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1583-1628, March.
    5. Thomas F. Burgess & Paul Grimshaw & Nicky E. Shaw, 2017. "Research Commentary—Diversity of the Information Systems Research Field: A Journal Governance Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 5-21, March.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4899 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Katharina Steininger & René Riedl & Friedrich Roithmayr & Peter Mertens, 2009. "Fads and Trends in Business and Information Systems Engineering and Information Systems Research – A Comparative Literature Analysis," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(6), pages 411-428, December.
    8. Mihail Cocosila & Alexander Serenko & Ofir Turel, 2011. "Exploring the management information systems discipline: a scientometric study of ICIS, PACIS and ASAC," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(1), pages 1-16, April.
    9. John Mingers, 2001. "Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 240-259, September.
    10. Jörg Becker & Jan Brocke & Marcel Heddier & Stefan Seidel, 2015. "In Search of Information Systems (Grand) Challenges," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(6), pages 377-390, December.
    11. Monideepa Tarafdar & Guohou Shan & Jason Bennett Thatcher & Alok Gupta, 2022. "Intellectual Diversity in IS Research: Discipline-Based Conceptualization and an Illustration from Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1490-1510, December.
    12. Rivera González Gibrán & Cox Andrew M. & Flores Zambada Ricardo, 2012. "A human resources project implementation An actor-network theory perspective," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 57(3), pages 9-39, julio-sep.
    13. Avgerou, Chrisanthi, 2000. "Information systems: what sort of science is it?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 567-579, October.
    14. Cédric Denis-Rémis & Olivier Codou & Jean-Fabrice Lebraty, 2010. "Green IT, China - France: similar reactions?," Post-Print halshs-00797320, HAL.
    15. David G. Schwartz, 2014. "Research Commentary ---The Disciplines of Information: Lessons from the History of the Discipline of Medicine," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 205-221, June.
    16. Robin Williams & Neil Pollock, 2012. "Research Commentary ---Moving Beyond the Single Site Implementation Study: How (and Why) We Should Study the Biography of Packaged Enterprise Solutions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Joseph S. Valacich & Mark A. Fuller & Christoph Schneider & Alan R. Dennis, 2006. "Issues and Opinions---Publication Opportunities in Premier Business Outlets: How Level Is the Playing Field?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 107-125, June.
    18. Schauer, Carola, 2007. "Rekonstruktion der historischen Entwicklung der Wirtschaftsinformatik: Schritte der Institutionalisierung, Diskussionen zum Status, Rahmenempfehlungen für die Lehre," ICB Research Reports 18, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB).
    19. Bernard Fallery & Florence Rodhain, 2009. "Management Information Systems : the Journey of a Research Field," Post-Print hal-00777795, HAL.
    20. Andrew Burton-Jones & Detmar W. Straub, 2006. "Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 228-246, September.
    21. Lange, Carola, 2005. "Development and Status of the Information Systems / Wirtschaftsinformatik Discipline. An Interpretive Evaluation of Interviews with Renowned Researchers: Part II - Results Information Systems Discipli," ICB Research Reports 3, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:7:y:1996:i:4:p:400-408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.