IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v10y1999i4p378-380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research Note. The Illusion of Electronic Brainstorming Productivity: Theoretical and Empirical Issues

Author

Listed:
  • Alain Pinsonneault

    (Faculty of Management, McGill University, 1001 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Québec, Canada H3A 1G5)

  • Henri Barki

    (École des Hautes Études Commerciales, 3000 Chemin de la Côte Ste-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3T 1A7)

  • R. Brent Gallupe

    (School of Business, Queens' University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6)

  • Norberto Hoppen

    (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Au Joao Pessoa, Porto Alegre, Brazil)

Abstract

After discussing how group size might affect the effectiveness of electronic brainstorming (EBS) as an idea generating tool, Dennis and Valacich (1999) conclude that EBS is not likely to surpass nominal brainstorming for small groups, but that for large groups (i.e., nine or more members), “EBS offers clear performance benefits over nominal group brainstorming, as well as verbal brainstorming.” However, in our view, the existing theoretical and empirical evidence does not provide sufficient justification to clearly establish EBS' superiority over nominal brainstorming for large groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Alain Pinsonneault & Henri Barki & R. Brent Gallupe & Norberto Hoppen, 1999. "Research Note. The Illusion of Electronic Brainstorming Productivity: Theoretical and Empirical Issues," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 378-380, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:10:y:1999:i:4:p:378-380
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.10.4.378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.4.378
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.10.4.378?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laku Chidambaram & Lai Lai Tung, 2005. "Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 149-168, June.
    2. Pawel Weichbroth, 2016. "Facing the Brainstorming Theory. A Case of Requirements Elicitation," GUT FME Working Paper Series A 42, Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdansk University of Technology.
    3. Bruce A. Reinig & Robert O. Briggs, 2008. "On The Relationship Between Idea-Quantity and Idea-Quality During Ideation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 403-420, September.
    4. David S. Kerr & Uday S. Murthy, 2004. "Divergent and Convergent Idea Generation in Teams: A Comparison of Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Communication," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 381-399, July.
    5. William G. Heninger & Alan R. Dennis & Kelly McNamara Hilmer, 2006. "Research Note: Individual Cognition and Dual-Task Interference in Group Support Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 415-424, December.
    6. William B. Martz & Morgan M. Shepherd, 2004. "Group Consensus: The Impact of Multiple Dialogues," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 315-325, July.
    7. Kerr, David S. & Murthy, Uday S., 2009. "Beyond brainstorming: The effectiveness of computer-mediated communication for convergence and negotiation tasks," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 245-262.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:10:y:1999:i:4:p:378-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.