IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v53y2023i2p133-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization Helps Scheduling Nursing Staff at the Long-Term Care Homes of the City of Toronto

Author

Listed:
  • Manion Anderson

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G8, Canada)

  • Merve Bodur

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G8, Canada)

  • Scott Rathwell

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G8, Canada)

  • Vahid Sarhangian

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G8, Canada)

Abstract

The City of Toronto Long-Term Care Homes and Services (LTCH&S) division is one of the largest providers of long-term care in the Canadian province of Ontario, providing care to 2,640 residents at 10 homes across Toronto. Our collaboration with LTCH&S was initiated to facilitate the increasingly challenging task of scheduling nursing staff and reduce the high absenteeism rate observed among the part-time nurses. We developed a spreadsheet-based scheduling tool to automate the generation of schedules and incorporate nurses’ preferences for different shifts into the schedules. At the core of the scheduling tool is a hierarchical optimization model that generates a feasible schedule with the highest total preference score while satisfying the maximum possible demand. Feasible schedules had to abide by a set of complex seniority requirements, which prioritized more-senior nurses when allocating the available shifts. Our scheduling tool was implemented in a 391-bed home in Toronto. The tool allowed nursing managers to generate feasible schedules within a fraction of an hour, in contrast to the status quo manual approach, which could take up to tens of hours. In addition, the schedules successfully accounted for preferences with, on average, above 94% of the allocated shifts ranked as most preferred.

Suggested Citation

  • Manion Anderson & Merve Bodur & Scott Rathwell & Vahid Sarhangian, 2023. "Optimization Helps Scheduling Nursing Staff at the Long-Term Care Homes of the City of Toronto," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 133-154, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:53:y:2023:i:2:p:133-154
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.2022.1132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.2022.1132
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.2022.1132?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anton Ovchinnikov & Joseph Milner, 2008. "Spreadsheet Model Helps to Assign Medical Residents at the University of Vermont's College of Medicine," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 311-323, August.
    2. René Bekker & Dennis Moeke & Bas Schmidt, 2019. "Keeping pace with the ebbs and flows in daily nursing home operations," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 350-363, June.
    3. Deborah L. Kellogg & Steven Walczak, 2007. "Nurse Scheduling: From Academia to Implementation or Not?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 355-369, August.
    4. Bellanti, F. & Carello, G. & Della Croce, F. & Tadei, R., 2004. "A greedy-based neighborhood search approach to a nurse rostering problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(1), pages 28-40, February.
    5. Berrada, Ilham & Ferland, Jacques A. & Michelon, Philippe, 1996. "A multi-objective approach to nurse scheduling with both hard and soft constraints," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 183-193, September.
    6. D. Michael Warner, 1976. "Scheduling Nursing Personnel According to Nursing Preference: A Mathematical Programming Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 842-856, October.
    7. Topaloglu, Seyda, 2009. "A shift scheduling model for employees with different seniority levels and an application in healthcare," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 943-957, November.
    8. Gaétan Caron & Pierri Hansen & Brigitte Jaumard, 1999. "The Assignment Problem with Seniority and Job Priority Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 449-453, June.
    9. Volgenant, A., 2004. "A note on the assignment problem with seniority and job priority constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(1), pages 330-335, April.
    10. Valouxis, Christos & Gogos, Christos & Goulas, George & Alefragis, Panayiotis & Housos, Efthymios, 2012. "A systematic two phase approach for the nurse rostering problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 425-433.
    11. Bard, Jonathan F. & Purnomo, Hadi W., 2005. "Preference scheduling for nurses using column generation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(2), pages 510-534, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shahab Sadri & Arsalan Paleshi & Lihui Bai & Monica Gentili, 2024. "A Simulation Study for a Safe Reopening and Operation of the Trager Institute Optimal Aging Clinic During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 188-204, March.
    2. Setareh Boshrouei Shargh & Mostafa Zandieh & Ashkan Ayough & Farbod Farhadi, 2024. "Scheduling in services: a review and bibliometric analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 754-783, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & De Bruecker, Philippe & Demeulemeester, Erik & De Boeck, Liesje, 2013. "Personnel scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 367-385.
    2. Vanhoucke, Mario & Maenhout, Broos, 2009. "On the characterization and generation of nurse scheduling problem instances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 457-467, July.
    3. Topaloglu, Seyda, 2009. "A shift scheduling model for employees with different seniority levels and an application in healthcare," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 943-957, November.
    4. Hadi W. Purnomo & Jonathan F. Bard, 2007. "Cyclic preference scheduling for nurses using branch and price," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(2), pages 200-220, March.
    5. Elín Björk Böðvarsdóttir & Niels-Christian Fink Bagger & Laura Elise Høffner & Thomas J. R. Stidsen, 2022. "A flexible mixed integer programming-based system for real-world nurse rostering," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 59-88, February.
    6. Deborah L. Kellogg & Steven Walczak, 2007. "Nurse Scheduling: From Academia to Implementation or Not?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 355-369, August.
    7. Jens Brunner & Günther Edenharter, 2011. "Long term staff scheduling of physicians with different experience levels in hospitals using column generation," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 189-202, June.
    8. Burke, Edmund K. & Curtois, Timothy & Post, Gerhard & Qu, Rong & Veltman, Bart, 2008. "A hybrid heuristic ordering and variable neighbourhood search for the nurse rostering problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 330-341, July.
    9. Sanja Petrovic & Greet Berghe, 2012. "A comparison of two approaches to nurse rostering problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 365-384, April.
    10. Castaño, Fabián & Velasco, Nubia, 2020. "Exact and heuristic approaches for the automated design of medical trainees rotation schedules," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Edmund K. Burke & Timothy Curtois & Rong Qu & Greet Vanden Berghe, 2013. "A Time Predefined Variable Depth Search for Nurse Rostering," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 411-419, August.
    12. Brech, Claus-Henning & Ernst, Andreas & Kolisch, Rainer, 2019. "Scheduling medical residents’ training at university hospitals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 253-266.
    13. Elina Rönnberg & Torbjörn Larsson, 2010. "Automating the self-scheduling process of nurses in Swedish healthcare: a pilot study," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 35-53, March.
    14. Jonas Baeklund, 2014. "Nurse rostering at a Danish ward," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 107-123, November.
    15. Eyjólfur Ingi Ásgeirsson & Guðríður Lilla Sigurðardóttir, 2016. "Near-optimal MIP solutions for preference based self-scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 239(1), pages 273-293, April.
    16. Edmund Burke & Jingpeng Li & Rong Qu, 2012. "A Pareto-based search methodology for multi-objective nurse scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 91-109, July.
    17. Paola Cappanera & Filippo Visintin & Roberta Rossi, 2022. "The emergency department physician rostering problem: obtaining equitable solutions via network optimization," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 916-959, December.
    18. Broos Maenhout & Mario Vanhoucke, 2013. "Analyzing the nursing organizational structure and process from a scheduling perspective," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 177-196, September.
    19. Burke, Edmund K. & Li, Jingpeng & Qu, Rong, 2010. "A hybrid model of integer programming and variable neighbourhood search for highly-constrained nurse rostering problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 484-493, June.
    20. Burke, Edmund K. & Curtois, Tim, 2014. "New approaches to nurse rostering benchmark instances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 71-81.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:53:y:2023:i:2:p:133-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.