IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v22y1992i6p15-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heathens, Heretics, and Cults: The Religious Spectrum of Decision Aiding

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald A. Howard

    (Department of Engineering-Economic Systems, Terman Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-4025)

Abstract

Over the past quarter century decision analysis has helped decision makers achieve clarity of action in fields that range from business to medicine. Some consulting companies practice primarily within the decision analysis paradigm. Major corporations strive to integrate decision analysis into their decision processes. Yet there are dissenters. To use a religious metaphor, heathens are those who pursue decision-aiding procedures that have different underlying philosophies. Heretics follow the general ideas of decision analysis but wish to change some underpinnings in a ruinous desire to achieve greater consistency with certain experiments involving unaided decision makers. Cults are composed of those who superficially follow the paradigm, but are willing to bend their practice in ways that allow the decision maker to avoid the dictates of logic while appearing to have done a decision analysis. Our examination of these views is based on the warranties each approach can support. The common sense warrantly requires, for example, that the addition of a noninformative new alternative cannot make a decision situation less desirable. A decision recommendation is no better than its warranties.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald A. Howard, 1992. "Heathens, Heretics, and Cults: The Religious Spectrum of Decision Aiding," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 15-27, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:22:y:1992:i:6:p:15-27
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.22.6.15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.22.6.15
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.22.6.15?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gutierrez, Isabel & Carmona, Salvador, 1995. "Ambiguity in multicriteria quality decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(2-3), pages 215-224, March.
    2. Jeffrey M. Keisler & Patrick S. Noonan, 2012. "Communicating Analytic Results: A Tutorial for Decision Consultants," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 274-292, September.
    3. Donald L. Keefer & Craig W. Kirkwood & James L. Corner, 2004. "Perspective on Decision Analysis Applications, 1990–2001," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 4-22, March.
    4. Moreno-Jimenez, J. M. & Aguaron-Joven, J. & Escobar-Urmeneta, M. T. & Turon-Lanuza, A., 1999. "Multicriteria procedural rationality on SISDEMA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 388-403, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:22:y:1992:i:6:p:15-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.