IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v17y1987i5p64-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Case Teaching More Effective than Lecture Teaching in Business Administration? An Exploratory Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Franz Böcker

    (School of Business, University of Regensburg, 8400 Regensburg, Germany)

Abstract

Case teaching is said to better motivate students and to transmit managerial information to students more effectively than lecture teaching. Field experimentation performed to quantify the effects of case teaching compared to those of lecture teaching supports the hypothesis that case teaching is more effective than lecture teaching with regard to attaining cognitive as well as motivational aims in the classroom.

Suggested Citation

  • Franz Böcker, 1987. "Is Case Teaching More Effective than Lecture Teaching in Business Administration? An Exploratory Analysis," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 17(5), pages 64-71, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:17:y:1987:i:5:p:64-71
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.17.5.64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.17.5.64
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.17.5.64?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crittenden, Victoria L., 2005. "Cross-functional education: the need for case development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(7), pages 955-959, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:17:y:1987:i:5:p:64-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.