IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v12y1982i5p62-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Ombudsman: Is Review By Peers As Fair As It Appears?

Author

Listed:
  • J. Scott Armstrong

    (The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

Abstract

Recent research shows that journal reviewing practices are neither objective nor fair. I propose a procedure to increase the likelihood of publishing important papers. This will be tested by Interfaces for a year.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Scott Armstrong, 1982. "The Ombudsman: Is Review By Peers As Fair As It Appears?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 12(5), pages 62-74, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:12:y:1982:i:5:p:62-74
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.12.5.62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.12.5.62
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.12.5.62?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    professional: comments on;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:12:y:1982:i:5:p:62-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.