IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v10y1980i1p51-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Four Views on Problem Structuring

Author

Listed:
  • M. Pidd

    (Department of Operational Research, University of Lancaster, England)

  • R. N. Woolley

    (University of Aston, Birmingham, England)

Abstract

Over the last year or so, we have been attempting to carry out naive research on OR/MS groups. We were a little concerned that though most educational programs do (in the United Kingdom at least) attempt to teach problem structuring, most of this effort was based on little or no systematic knowledge. That is, there seems to be a dearth of empirical research from which lessons could be learned. We found quite a few of the grand old men of OR reflecting on their own experience, but little or no comparative examination of current practice. So we decided to go out and look to see if a rigorous study would be feasible and worthwhile.In addition to our empirical work, we took the time to search through the OR/MS literature to see what could be found therein. The product of that search is reported more fully in another paper [Woolley, R. N., M. Pidd. 1978. Problem structuring in operational research: A review of the literature. Working Paper No. 111, University of Aston Management Centre.]. We thought that readers of Interfaces might be interested in seeing the pattern which we found emerging from the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Pidd & R. N. Woolley, 1980. "Four Views on Problem Structuring," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 51-54, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:10:y:1980:i:1:p:51-54
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.10.1.51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.10.1.51
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.10.1.51?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. BüyükdamgacI, Güldal, 2003. "Process of organizational problem definition: how to evaluate and how to improve," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 327-338, August.
    2. Nathalie Gartiser & Sébastien Dubois, 2005. "Du problème à son processus de résolution : entre positivisme et constructivisme. Application à la conception de systèmes techniques," Post-Print hal-00340985, HAL.
    3. Ellspermann, Susan J. & Evans, Gerald W. & Basadur, Min, 2007. "The impact of training on the formulation of ill-structured problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 221-236, April.
    4. Michael Pidd, 1999. "Just Modeling Through: A Rough Guide to Modeling," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 118-132, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    professional: OR/MS philosophy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:10:y:1980:i:1:p:51-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.