IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v34y2022i6p2950-2967.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Setting Reserve Prices in Second-Price Auctions with Unobserved Bids

Author

Listed:
  • Jason Rhuggenaath

    (Department of Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands)

  • Alp Akcay

    (Department of Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands)

  • Yingqian Zhang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands)

  • Uzay Kaymak

    (Jheronimus Academy of Data Science, 5211 DA ‘s-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands)

Abstract

In this work we consider a seller who sells an item via second-price auctions with a reserve price. By controlling the reserve price, the seller can influence the revenue from the auction, and in this paper, we propose a method for learning optimal reserve prices. We study a limited information setting where the probability distribution of the bids from bidders is unknown and the values of the bids are not revealed to the seller. Furthermore, we do not assume that the seller has access to a historical data set with bids. Our main contribution is a method that incorporates knowledge about the rules of second-price auctions into a multiarmed bandit framework for optimizing reserve prices in our limited information setting. The proposed method can be applied in both stationary and nonstationary environments. Experiments show that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art bandit algorithms. In stationary environments, our method outperforms these algorithms when the horizon is short and performs as good as they do for longer horizons. Our method is especially useful if there is a high number of potential reserve prices. In addition, our method adapts quickly to changing environments and outperforms state-of-the-art bandit algorithms designed for nonstationary environments. Summary of Contribution: A key challenge in online advertising is the pricing of advertisements in online auctions. The scope of our study is second-price auctions with a focus on the reserve price optimization problem from a seller’s point of view. This problem is motivated by the real-life practice of small and medium-sized web publishers. However, the proposed solution approach is applicable to any seller who sells an item via second-price auctions and wants to optimize its reserve price during these auctions. Our solution approach is based on techniques from machine learning and operations research, and it would be beneficial especially for sellers who start the selling process without any historical data and can collect the data on the outcomes of the auctions while making reserve price decisions over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason Rhuggenaath & Alp Akcay & Yingqian Zhang & Uzay Kaymak, 2022. "Setting Reserve Prices in Second-Price Auctions with Unobserved Bids," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 2950-2967, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:6:p:2950-2967
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2022.1199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.1199
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2022.1199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Santiago R. Balseiro & Jon Feldman & Vahab Mirrokni & S. Muthukrishnan, 2014. "Yield Optimization of Display Advertising with Ad Exchange," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2886-2907, December.
    2. Yanwu Yang & Daniel Zeng & Yinghui Yang & Jie Zhang, 2015. "Optimal Budget Allocation Across Search Advertising Markets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 285-300, May.
    3. William Vickrey, 1961. "Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 16(1), pages 8-37, March.
    4. Shalinda Adikari & Kaushik Dutta, 2019. "A New Approach to Real-Time Bidding in Online Advertisements: Auto Pricing Strategy," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 66-82, February.
    5. Arnoud V. den Boer & Bert Zwart, 2014. "Simultaneously Learning and Optimizing Using Controlled Variance Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 770-783, March.
    6. Kanishka Misra & Eric M. Schwartz & Jacob Abernethy, 2019. "Dynamic Online Pricing with Incomplete Information Using Multiarmed Bandit Experiments," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 226-252, March.
    7. Wolfgang Jank & Shu Zhang, 2011. "An Automated and Data-Driven Bidding Strategy for Online Auctions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 238-253, May.
    8. Santiago R. Balseiro & Omar Besbes & Gabriel Y. Weintraub, 2015. "Repeated Auctions with Budgets in Ad Exchanges: Approximations and Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 864-884, April.
    9. Wang Chi Cheung & David Simchi-Levi & He Wang, 2017. "Technical Note—Dynamic Pricing and Demand Learning with Limited Price Experimentation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1722-1731, December.
    10. Arnoud V. den Boer & Bert Zwart, 2015. "Dynamic Pricing and Learning with Finite Inventories," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 965-978, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Chaolin & Xiong, Yi, 2020. "Nonparametric advertising budget allocation with inventory constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 631-641.
    2. Thomas Loots & Arnoud V. den Boer, 2023. "Data‐driven collusion and competition in a pricing duopoly with multinomial logit demand," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(4), pages 1169-1186, April.
    3. Joon Suk Huh & Ellen Vitercik & Kirthevasan Kandasamy, 2024. "Bandit Profit-maximization for Targeted Marketing," Papers 2403.01361, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    4. Ilan Lobel, 2021. "Revenue Management and the Rise of the Algorithmic Economy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5389-5398, September.
    5. Boxiao Chen & Xiuli Chao & Cong Shi, 2021. "Nonparametric Learning Algorithms for Joint Pricing and Inventory Control with Lost Sales and Censored Demand," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 726-756, May.
    6. Sameer Mehta & Milind Dawande & Ganesh Janakiraman & Vijay Mookerjee, 2020. "Sustaining a Good Impression: Mechanisms for Selling Partitioned Impressions at Ad Exchanges," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 126-147, March.
    7. Athanassios N. Avramidis & Arnoud V. Boer, 2021. "Dynamic pricing with finite price sets: a non-parametric approach," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 94(1), pages 1-34, August.
    8. M'ed'eric Motte & Huy^en Pham, 2021. "Optimal bidding strategies for digital advertising," Papers 2111.08311, arXiv.org.
    9. Santiago R. Balseiro & Yonatan Gur, 2019. "Learning in Repeated Auctions with Budgets: Regret Minimization and Equilibrium," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(9), pages 3952-3968, September.
    10. Miguel A. Lejeune & John Turner, 2019. "Planning Online Advertising Using Gini Indices," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1222-1245, September.
    11. Hana Choi & Carl F. Mela & Santiago R. Balseiro & Adam Leary, 2020. "Online Display Advertising Markets: A Literature Review and Future Directions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 556-575, June.
    12. Shumpei Goke & Gabriel Y. Weintraub & Ralph Mastromonaco & Sam Seljan, 2021. "Bidders' Responses to Auction Format Change in Internet Display Advertising Auctions," Papers 2110.13814, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    13. den Boer, Arnoud V., 2015. "Tracking the market: Dynamic pricing and learning in a changing environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 914-927.
    14. Ruben Geer & Arnoud V. Boer & Christopher Bayliss & Christine S. M. Currie & Andria Ellina & Malte Esders & Alwin Haensel & Xiao Lei & Kyle D. S. Maclean & Antonio Martinez-Sykora & Asbjørn Nilsen Ris, 2019. "Dynamic pricing and learning with competition: insights from the dynamic pricing challenge at the 2017 INFORMS RM & pricing conference," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 185-203, June.
    15. Zikun Ye & Dennis J. Zhang & Heng Zhang & Renyu Zhang & Xin Chen & Zhiwei Xu, 2023. "Cold Start to Improve Market Thickness on Online Advertising Platforms: Data-Driven Algorithms and Field Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 3838-3860, July.
    16. Woonghee Tim Huh & Michael Jong Kim & Meichun Lin, 2022. "Bayesian dithering for learning: Asymptotically optimal policies in dynamic pricing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(9), pages 3576-3593, September.
    17. Jian Hu & Junxuan Li & Sanjay Mehrotra, 2019. "A Data-Driven Functionally Robust Approach for Simultaneous Pricing and Order Quantity Decisions with Unknown Demand Function," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1564-1585, November.
    18. Kotowski, Maciej H., 2020. "First-price auctions with budget constraints," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(1), January.
    19. Ningyuan Chen & Guillermo Gallego, 2021. "Nonparametric Pricing Analytics with Customer Covariates," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 974-984, May.
    20. Patrick Hummel & R. Preston McAfee & Sergei Vassilvitskii, 2016. "Incentivizing advertiser networks to submit multiple bids," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 45(4), pages 1031-1052, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:6:p:2950-2967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.