IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v34y2022i1p183-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A High-Fidelity Model to Predict Length of Stay in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Author

Listed:
  • Kanix Wang

    (Booth School of Business, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637)

  • Walid Hussain

    (Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637)

  • John R. Birge

    (Booth School of Business, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637)

  • Michael D. Schreiber

    (Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637)

  • Daniel Adelman

    (Booth School of Business, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637)

Abstract

Having an interpretable, dynamic length-of-stay model can help hospital administrators and clinicians make better decisions and improve the quality of care. The widespread implementation of electronic medical record (EMR) systems has enabled hospitals to collect massive amounts of health data. However, how to integrate this deluge of data into healthcare operations remains unclear. We propose a framework grounded in established clinical knowledge to model patients’ lengths of stay. In particular, we impose expert knowledge when grouping raw clinical data into medically meaningful variables that summarize patients’ health trajectories. We use dynamic, predictive models to output patients’ remaining lengths of stay, future discharges, and census probability distributions based on their health trajectories up to the current stay. Evaluated with large-scale EMR data, the dynamic model significantly improves predictive power over the performance of any model in previous literature and remains medically interpretable. Summary of Contribution: The widespread implementation of electronic health systems has created opportunities and challenges to best utilize mounting clinical data for healthcare operations. In this study, we propose a new approach that integrates clinical analysis in generating variables and implementations of computational methods. This approach allows our model to remain interpretable to the medical professionals while being accurate. We believe our study has broader relevance to researchers and practitioners of healthcare operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kanix Wang & Walid Hussain & John R. Birge & Michael D. Schreiber & Daniel Adelman, 2022. "A High-Fidelity Model to Predict Length of Stay in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 183-195, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:1:p:183-195
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2021.1062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2021.1062
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2021.1062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marjorie Rosenberg & Mark Browne, 2001. "The Impact of the Inpatient Prospective Payment System and Diagnosis-Related Groups," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 84-94.
    2. Gregory Dobson & Hsiao-Hui Lee & Edieal Pinker, 2010. "A Model of ICU Bumping," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1564-1576, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huiyin Ouyang & Nilay Tanık Argon & Serhan Ziya, 2020. "Allocation of Intensive Care Unit Beds in Periods of High Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 591-608, March.
    2. Carri W. Chan & Vivek F. Farias & Gabriel J. Escobar, 2017. "The Impact of Delays on Service Times in the Intensive Care Unit," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(7), pages 2049-2072, July.
    3. Jie Bai & Andreas Fügener & Jan Schoenfelder & Jens O. Brunner, 2018. "Operations research in intensive care unit management: a literature review," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Shen, Zuo-Jun Max & Xie, Jingui & Zheng, Zhichao & Zhou, Han, 2023. "Dynamic scheduling with uncertain job types," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1047-1060.
    5. Carri W. Chan & Jing Dong & Linda V. Green, 2017. "Queues with Time-Varying Arrivals and Inspections with Applications to Hospital Discharge Policies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 469-495, April.
    6. David D. Cho & Kurt M. Bretthauer & Jan Schoenfelder, 2023. "Patient-to-nurse ratios: Balancing quality, nurse turnover, and cost," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 807-826, December.
    7. Fermín Mallor & Cristina Azcárate & Julio Barado, 2015. "Optimal control of ICU patient discharge: from theory to implementation," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 234-250, September.
    8. Jie Bai & Andreas Fügener & Jochen Gönsch & Jens O. Brunner & Manfred Blobner, 2021. "Managing admission and discharge processes in intensive care units," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 666-685, December.
    9. Josephine Varney & Nigel Bean & Mark Mackay, 2019. "The self-regulating nature of occupancy in ICUs: stochastic homoeostasis," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 615-634, December.
    10. Kjartan Sarheim Anthun & Johan Håkon Bjørngaard & Jon Magnussen, 2017. "Economic incentives and diagnostic coding in a public health care system," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 83-101, March.
    11. Paolo Berta & Chiara Seghieri & Giorgio Vittadini, 2013. "Comparing health outcomes among hospitals: the experience of the Lombardy Region," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 245-257, September.
    12. Ana Batista & Jorge Vera & David Pozo, 2020. "Multi-objective admission planning problem: a two-stage stochastic approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 51-65, March.
    13. Azcarate, Cristina & Esparza, Laida & Mallor, Fermin, 2020. "The problem of the last bed: Contextualization and a new simulation framework for analyzing physician decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Laurence C. Baker & Karine Lamiraud, 2022. "Adoption of hospital diagnosis‐related group financing in Switzerland and the availability of computed tomography scanners," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(12), pages 2537-2557, December.
    15. Silviya Valeva & Guodong Pang & Andrew J. Schaefer & Gilles Clermont, 2023. "Acuity-Based Allocation of ICU-Downstream Beds with Flexible Staffing," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 403-422, March.
    16. Daniel Gartner & Rainer Kolisch & Daniel B. Neill & Rema Padman, 2015. "Machine Learning Approaches for Early DRG Classification and Resource Allocation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 718-734, November.
    17. Alex F. Mills & Jonathan E. Helm & Yu Wang, 2021. "Surge Capacity Deployment in Hospitals: Effectiveness of Response and Mitigation Strategies," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 367-387, March.
    18. Powell, Philip T. & Laufer, Ron, 2010. "The promises and constraints of consumer-directed healthcare," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 171-182, March.
    19. Cheng, Shou-Hsia & Chen, Chi-Chen & Tsai, Shu-Ling, 2012. "The impacts of DRG-based payments on health care provider behaviors under a universal coverage system: A population-based study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 202-208.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:1:p:183-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.