IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ordeca/v19y2022i2p141-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patchwork Constructions of Multiattribute Utility Functions

Author

Listed:
  • Jiehua Xie

    (School of Business Administration, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Jiangxi 330099, P.R. China)

  • Zhengyong Zhou

    (Department of Financial Mathematics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P.R. China)

Abstract

The construction of a representative multiattribute utility function is important in decision analysis. Existing methods focus mainly on constructions of utility functions on the whole domain of attributes. In some cases, decision makers may provide partial information on their local utility assessments. Therefore, it is a challenging and interesting task to construct utility functions that are compatible with local assessments provided by decision makers. This paper proposes the patchwork construction to accomplish this task. We first define a special local preference structure, the local utility independence and then discuss the patchwork construction that unifies local utility independence on different local domains. The utility function elicited by the patchwork approach under the local utility independence condition is named as the local-utility-independent utility function. Three types of local-utility-independent utility functions on three typical partitions are proposed. These local-utility-independent utility functions have concise and tractable functional forms and indicate intuitive preference structures while matching prior known local utility assessments. Furthermore, the preference structures implied by these three types of local-utility-independent utility functions have a close relationship with the n -switch independence. Sufficient and necessary conditions guaranteeing these local-utility-independent utility functions to indicate n -switch independence are provided, respectively. All three types of local-utility-independent utility functions also have an important application in the approximations of arbitrary utility functions when only some local assessments are provided. As approximations, they are robust and have high accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiehua Xie & Zhengyong Zhou, 2022. "Patchwork Constructions of Multiattribute Utility Functions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 141-169, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:141-169
    DOI: 10.1287/deca.2021.0448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/deca.2021.0448
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/deca.2021.0448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James S. Dyer & Rakesh K. Sarin, 1982. "Relative Risk Aversion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(8), pages 875-886, August.
    2. Soumyadip Ghosh & Shane G. Henderson, 2002. "Chessboard Distributions and Random Vectors with Specified Marginals and Covariance Matrix," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 820-834, October.
    3. Ali E. Abbas & David E. Bell, 2011. "One-Switch Independence for Multiattribute Utility Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 764-771, June.
    4. Dionne, Georges & Li, Jingyuan, 2014. "Comparative Ross risk aversion in the presence of mean dependent risks," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 128-135.
    5. Suleyman Basak & Dmitry Makarov, 2014. "Strategic Asset Allocation in Money Management," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(1), pages 179-217, February.
    6. Ali E. Abbas, 2009. "Multiattribute Utility Copulas," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1367-1383, December.
    7. Craig W. Kirkwood, 1976. "Parametrically Dependent Preferences for Multiattributed Consequences," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 92-103, February.
    8. Ralph L. Keeney, 1981. "Analysis of Preference Dependencies among Objectives," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1105-1120, December.
    9. James L. Corner & Craig W. Kirkwood, 1996. "The Magnitude of Errors in Proximal Multiattribute Decision Analysis with Probabilistically Dependent Attributes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(7), pages 1033-1042, July.
    10. Peter C. Fishburn, 1977. "Approximations of Two-Attribute Utility Functions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 30-44, February.
    11. Peter H. Farquhar, 1975. "A Fractional Hypercube Decomposition Theorem for Multiattribute Utility Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 941-967, October.
    12. Finkelshtain, Israel & Kella, Offer & Scarsini, Marco, 1999. "On risk aversion with two risks," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 239-250, March.
    13. David E. Bell, 1979. "Multiattribute Utility Functions: Decompositions Using Interpolation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(8), pages 744-753, August.
    14. James S. Dyer & Peter C. Fishburn & Ralph E. Steuer & Jyrki Wallenius & Stanley Zionts, 1992. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: The Next Ten Years," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 645-654, May.
    15. Corner, James L., 1994. "Operationalizing approximate multiattribute utility functions for use in practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 73-84, November.
    16. Yang, Jian-Bo & Sen, Pratyush, 1996. "Preference modelling by estimating local utility functions for multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 115-138, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea C. Hupman & Jay Simon, 2023. "The Legacy of Peter Fishburn: Foundational Work and Lasting Impact," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali E. Abbas & Ronald A. Howard, 2005. "Attribute Dominance Utility," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 185-206, December.
    2. Ali E. Abbas, 2013. "Utility Copula Functions Matching All Boundary Assessments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 359-371, April.
    3. Ali E. Abbas, 2009. "Multiattribute Utility Copulas," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1367-1383, December.
    4. Ali E. Abbas & David E. Bell, 2015. "Ordinal One-Switch Utility Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1411-1419, December.
    5. Ali E. Abbas & Zhengwei Sun, 2015. "Multiattribute Utility Functions Satisfying Mutual Preferential Independence," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 378-393, April.
    6. Ali E. Abbas & Zhengwei Sun, 2019. "Archimedean Utility Copulas with Polynomial Generating Functions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 218-237, September.
    7. Ali E. Abbas, 2011. "The Multiattribute Utility Tree," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 180-205, September.
    8. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio, 2016. "Combining analytical hierarchy process and Choquet integral within non-additive robust ordinal regression," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 2-18.
    9. Andrea C. Hupman & Jay Simon, 2023. "The Legacy of Peter Fishburn: Foundational Work and Lasting Impact," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Ying He & James S. Dyer & John C. Butler, 2014. "Decomposing a Utility Function Based on Discrete Distribution Independence," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 233-249, December.
    11. Ali E. Abbas & David E. Bell, 2012. "METHODS---One-Switch Conditions for Multiattribute Utility Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1199-1212, October.
    12. Ali E. Abbas & David E. Bell, 2011. "One-Switch Independence for Multiattribute Utility Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 764-771, June.
    13. Wong, Kit Pong, 2021. "Comparative risk aversion with two risks," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    14. L. Robin Keller & Jay Simon, 2019. "Preference Functions for Spatial Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 244-256, January.
    15. Beccacece, Francesca & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Buzzard, Greg & Cillo, Alessandra & Zionts, Stanley, 2015. "Elicitation of multiattribute value functions through high dimensional model representations: Monotonicity and interactions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 517-527.
    16. Dionne, Georges & Li, Jingyuan, 2014. "Comparative Ross risk aversion in the presence of mean dependent risks," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 128-135.
    17. Francesca Beccacece & Emanuele Borgonovo & Greg Buzzard & Alessandra Cillo & Stanley Zionts, 2013. "Elicitation of Multiattribute Value Functions through High Dimensional Model Representations," Working Papers 495, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    18. Dionne, Georges & Li, Jingyuan, 2012. "Comparative Ross risk aversion in the presence of quadrant dependent risks," Working Papers 12-7, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    19. Yang, Jian-Bo, 1999. "Gradient projection and local region search for multiobjective optimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 432-459, January.
    20. Schuwirth, N. & Reichert, P. & Lienert, J., 2012. "Methodological aspects of multi-criteria decision analysis for policy support: A case study on pharmaceutical removal from hospital wastewater," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 472-483.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:141-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.