IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ijb/journl/v19y2020i2p187-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the Blind Principal Bid Mechanism: A Large Deviation Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Christos I. Giannikos

    (Baruch College and Graduate Center, City University of New York, USA)

  • Andreas Kakolyris

    (The O’Malley School of Business, Manhattan College, USA)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the mechanism of blind principal bid (BPB) which is the result of an auction. An agent auctions a large basket of transactions in several stocks to brokers who do not know the individual stock names, but only some generic characteristics of the basket. The client delivers this large amount of sales and purchases to the winning broker who has to simultaneously trade the basket for a fixed commission fee. The commission is paid on the basis of the winning bid at the auction, usually submitted as cents per share. This study provides a new model, based on large deviations (LD) approximation results, that may facilitate brokers to formulate their bids. A numerical example is used to illustrate the methodology and the model is being compared with a Monte Carlo approximation.

Suggested Citation

  • Christos I. Giannikos & Andreas Kakolyris, 2020. "Modelling the Blind Principal Bid Mechanism: A Large Deviation Approach," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 19(2), pages 187-200, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ijb:journl:v:19:y:2020:i:2:p:187-200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijbe.fcu.edu.tw/assets/ijbe/past_issue/No.19-2/pdf/vol_19-2-4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ijbe.fcu.edu.tw/assets/ijbe/past_issue/No.19-2/abstract/04.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christos Giannikos & Hany Guirguis & Tin Shan Suen, 2012. "Modelling the Blind Principal Bid Basket Trading Cost," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 18(2), pages 271-302, March.
    2. Michael Stutzer, 2011. "Portfolio choice with endogenous utility: a large deviations approach," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & Edward O Thorp & William T Ziemba (ed.), THE KELLY CAPITAL GROWTH INVESTMENT CRITERION THEORY and PRACTICE, chapter 43, pages 619-640, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Stoll, Hans R, 1978. "The Supply of Dealer Services in Securities Markets," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 33(4), pages 1133-1151, September.
    4. Stoll, Hans R, 1978. "The Pricing of Security Dealer Services: An Empirical Study of NASDAQ Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 33(4), pages 1153-1172, September.
    5. Kavajecz, Kenneth A. & Keim, Donald B., 2005. "Packaging Liquidity: Blind Auctions and Transaction Efficiencies," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(3), pages 465-492, September.
    6. Bollen, Nicolas P. B. & Smith, Tom & Whaley, Robert E., 2004. "Modeling the bid/ask spread: measuring the inventory-holding premium," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 97-141, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giannikos, Christos I. & Kakolyris, Andreas & Suen, Tin Shan, 2023. "Prospect theory and a manager's decision to trade a blind principal bid basket," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Frömmel & F Van Gysegem, 2014. "Bid-Ask Spread Components on the Foreign Exchange Market: Quantifying the Risk Component," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 14/878, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    2. Michael Padilla & Benjamin Van Roy, 2012. "Intermediated Blind Portfolio Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(9), pages 1747-1760, September.
    3. Li, Yubin & Zhao, Chen & Zhong, Zhaodong, 2019. "Price discrimination against retail Investors: Evidence from mini options," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 50-64.
    4. Wu, Wei-Shao & Liu, Yu-Jane & Lee, Yi-Tsung & Fok, Robert C.W., 2014. "Hedging costs, liquidity, and inventory management: The evidence from option market makers," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 25-48.
    5. Mazza, Paolo, 2015. "Price dynamics and market liquidity: An intraday event study on Euronext," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 139-153.
    6. Vayanos, Dimitri & Wang, Jiang, 2013. "Market Liquidity—Theory and Empirical Evidence ," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1289-1361, Elsevier.
    7. Blau, Benjamin M., 2018. "Does religiosity affect liquidity in financial markets?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 72-83.
    8. Marcelo Brutti Righi & Kelmara Mendes Vieira & Daniel Arruda Coronel & Reisoli Bender Filho & Paulo Sergio Ceretta, 2014. "Decomposing the bid-ask spread in the Brazilian market: an intraday framework," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 34(3), pages 2010-2023.
    9. Jagjeev Dosanjh, 2017. "Exchange Initiatives and Market Efficiency: Evidence from the Australian Securities Exchange," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 1-2017, January-A.
    10. Aritra Pan & Arun Kumar Misra, 2022. "Assessment of Asymmetric Information Cost in Indian Stock Market: A Sectoral Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(2), pages 512-535, April.
    11. Chia, Yee-Ee & Lim, Kian-Ping & Goh, Kim-Leng, 2020. "More shareholders, higher liquidity? Evidence from an emerging stock market," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    12. Salomonsson, Marcus, 2009. "Introducing a spread into the Kyle model," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 713, Stockholm School of Economics.
    13. Laux, Paul A., 1995. "Dealer market structure, outside competition, and the bid-ask spread," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 683-710, May.
    14. Albert S. Kyle & Anna A. Obizhaeva, 2016. "Market Microstructure Invariance: Empirical Hypotheses," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1345-1404, July.
    15. repec:uts:finphd:34 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Richie, Nivine & Madura, Jeff, 2007. "Impact of the QQQ on liquidity and risk of the underlying stocks," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 411-421, July.
    17. Venkateswar, Sankaran, 1992. "Replacement cost disclosures, information asymmetry and market-maker behaviour: Assessment through the bid-ask spread," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 139-155.
    18. Atmaz, Adem & Basak, Suleyman, 2019. "Option prices and costly short-selling," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 1-28.
    19. Chen, Bingyi, 2022. "Do investors value audit quality of complex estimates?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    20. Stoll, Hans R. & Schenzler, Christoph, 2006. "Trades outside the quotes: Reporting delay, trading option, or trade size?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 615-653, March.
    21. Chordia, Tarun & Roll, Richard & Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar, 2000. "Order Imbalance, Liquidity, and Market Returns," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt7gh9t9w3, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Blind Principal Bid; Large Deviations; Portfolio Loss; Bidding-Auctions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
    • D47 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Market Design

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ijb:journl:v:19:y:2020:i:2:p:187-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Szu-Hsien Ho (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbfcutw.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.