IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jopcd0/v8y2018i4p38-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Written Speech: A Barrier to Knowledge Building in Blended Learning Teacher Professional Development

Author

Listed:
  • Pamela Moen

    (Northcentral University, Scottsdale, USA)

  • Kelley Walters

    (Northcentral University, Scottsdale, USA)

Abstract

Data collected within this qualitative, multiple-case study included teachers' knowledge building preferences for written speech in a virtual community of practice (VCoP), blended learning, teacher professional development program. This data was analyzed using the theoretical tenets of Vygotsky's social constructivist learning theory. Through heterogeneous sampling, six sites were selected from 11 program participating schools, with 11 participating teachers purposively selected from these sites. Following semi-structured participant interviews, data were coded and analyzed, where the findings indicated that participants preferred the audiovisual learning content to the written activity format in the blended learning, VCoP teacher professional development program. Program developers may use the research findings to guide the development of VCoP content alternatives to singularly text based online professional development delivery models. Recommendations for future research include studies that address the impact of audiovisual VCoP content on knowledge building.

Suggested Citation

  • Pamela Moen & Kelley Walters, 2018. "Written Speech: A Barrier to Knowledge Building in Blended Learning Teacher Professional Development," International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), IGI Global, vol. 8(4), pages 38-49, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jopcd0:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:38-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJOPCD.2018100103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jopcd0:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:38-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.