IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jopcd0/v10y2020i3p78-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Traditional and Online Instructional Delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Peter William Stonebraker

    (Loyola University Chicago, USA)

  • Gezinus J. Hidding

    (Loyola University Chicago, USA)

Abstract

This paper first describes the dilemma of online pedagogies. Then it reviews prior research in business courses about the outcomes of online instruction compared with traditional methods. Prior research suffers from various research methodology issues that are categorized. Subsequently, a pre/poststudy of over 200 undergraduate business statistics students is presented using one-sample and two-population tests to address the learning outcomes of instructional delivery. Overall, based on this sound research design, online instructional delivery resulted in learning outcomes, measured on three dimensions, that were found to be statistically equivalent to those of traditional delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter William Stonebraker & Gezinus J. Hidding, 2020. "Comparing Traditional and Online Instructional Delivery," International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), IGI Global, vol. 10(3), pages 78-90, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jopcd0:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:78-90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJOPCD.2020070105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jopcd0:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:78-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.