IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jmbl00/v9y2017i3p24-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of Reusable Learning Objects to Enhance the Delivery of Veterinary Education: A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Chapman-Waterhouse

    (Harper Adams University, Shropshire, UK)

  • Ayona Silva-Fletcher

    (Royal Veterinary College, London, UK)

  • Kim Whittlestone

    (Royal Veterinary College, London, UK)

Abstract

The increased demand from learners in higher education to access resources flexibly has resulted in considerable development in the use of Reusable Learning Objects (RLO) via a blended learning format across the sector. This critical review sets out to identify what is currently known about RLO and how those concepts can be applied to veterinary-related degree courses. The review provides an insight into an aspect of blended learning which is currently limited in terms of published research. The effect of computer confidence, students' choice to use and the impact on student performance are some of the variables which have been measured to date. The approach to RLO by students from different courses may vary, but prior experience of technology, alignment of content and availability of technical support are some of the key drivers for usage and reuse. A positive effect is likely to occur following RLO use because those students have adopted a process of active engagement, which the authors know can bring about a deeper approach to learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Chapman-Waterhouse & Ayona Silva-Fletcher & Kim Whittlestone, 2017. "The Use of Reusable Learning Objects to Enhance the Delivery of Veterinary Education: A Literature Review," International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), IGI Global, vol. 9(3), pages 24-36, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jmbl00:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:24-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJMBL.2017070103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jmbl00:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:24-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.