IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jmbl00/v11y2019i3p38-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Biomedical Science Students Use Their Mobile Devices for Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjay Vasudeva

    (University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia)

  • Kay Colthorpe

    (University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia)

  • Hardy Ernst

    (University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia)

  • Kai Wei Lam

    (University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia)

Abstract

Learning occurs in many forms, and learning through mobile devices is becoming increasingly common in higher education. Potentially, there are many ways students may implement mobile learning to enhance learning, and this may be influenced by students' confidence and preferences. To identify mobile learning behaviours, biomedical students (n=189) were asked in meta-learning assessment tasks to report on self-initiated ways they used mobile devices for learning. Thematic analysis of responses showed students were confident using mobile devices for learning, but students of all confidence levels had similar usage levels. Students most commonly reported using laptops for note-taking, watching lecture recordings, and planning, and using phones for looking up concepts and using applications. This contributed to their self-regulation primarily by aiding students' keeping of records and information seeking behaviors. Students also implemented many new ways of using devices during semester, demonstrating adaptability. Surprisingly, they rarely reported seeking social assistance via mobile devices.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjay Vasudeva & Kay Colthorpe & Hardy Ernst & Kai Wei Lam, 2019. "How Biomedical Science Students Use Their Mobile Devices for Learning," International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), IGI Global, vol. 11(3), pages 38-54, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jmbl00:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:38-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJMBL.2019070103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jmbl00:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:38-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.