IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jkm000/v9y2013i2p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Expected Reciprocity in Knowledge Sharing

Author

Listed:
  • Megan L. Endres

    (Department of Management, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA)

  • Sanjib Chowdhury

    (Department of Management, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA)

Abstract

The authors investigated the effects of expected reciprocity on knowledge sharing, as moderated by team and individual variables. Data (n = 84) was collected in an experimental study from undergraduate business student participants. Effects of expected reciprocity on knowledge sharing depended on the levels of individual competence, positive team attitudes, functional diversity and demographic diversity. Implications include that the effectiveness of reciprocity in knowledge sharing depends on several factors relating to the team and individual. Encouraging reciprocity may have positive effects, but these can be overridden by poor team attitudes, low ability perceptions and team diversity. Future research suggestions are offered.

Suggested Citation

  • Megan L. Endres & Sanjib Chowdhury, 2013. "The Role of Expected Reciprocity in Knowledge Sharing," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jkm000:v:9:y:2013:i:2:p:1-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jkm.2013040101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Víctor Yepes & Salvador López, 2023. "The Knowledge Sharing Capability in Innovative Behavior: A SEM Approach from Graduate Students’ Insights," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Tobias Schoenherr & Elliot Bendoly & Daniel G. Bachrach & Anthony C. Hood, 2017. "Task Interdependence Impacts on Reciprocity in IT Implementation Teams: Bringing Out the Worst in Us, or Driving Responsibility?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 667-685, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jkm000:v:9:y:2013:i:2:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.