IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jeco00/v20y2022i1p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Study to Examine Drivers of Personal Cloud Computing Usage

Author

Listed:
  • Chuleeporn Changchit

    (Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, USA)

  • Robert Cutshall

    (Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, USA)

  • Charles Changchit

    (Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, USA)

Abstract

Cloud computing is recognized as an important area for information technology (IT) innovation and investment. Many companies are rapidly reorienting their overall IT strategies to include cloud computing. Cloud computing reduces the cost of IT since there is no installing, maintaining, or updating software as well as the elimination of IT emergencies or working after hours. Despite the potential for positive change, there are still other factors to consider before cloud computing can be accepted entirely by the individual, large business, or academic group. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to examine how individuals perceive cloud computing. The study findings reveal several factors which play an important role in their decision whether to adopt cloud computing technology. This study will contribute to the literature by proposing and empirically testing factors that impact the intention to adopt cloud computing.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuleeporn Changchit & Robert Cutshall & Charles Changchit, 2022. "An Empirical Study to Examine Drivers of Personal Cloud Computing Usage," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jeco00:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:1-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/JECO.298642
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul A. Pavlou & Angelika Dimoka, 2006. "The Nature and Role of Feedback Text Comments in Online Marketplaces: Implications for Trust Building, Price Premiums, and Seller Differentiation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 392-414, December.
    2. Dan J. Kim & Donald L. Ferrin & H. Raghav Rao, 2009. "Trust and Satisfaction, Two Stepping Stones for Successful E-Commerce Relationships: A Longitudinal Exploration," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 237-257, June.
    3. Paul A. Pavlou & David Gefen, 2004. "Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 37-59, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marzieh Soleimani, 2022. "Buyers' trust and mistrust in e-commerce platforms: a synthesizing literature review," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 57-78, March.
    2. Xue (Jane) Tan & Youwei Wang & Yong Tan, 2019. "Impact of Live Chat on Purchase in Electronic Markets: The Moderating Role of Information Cues," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1248-1271, December.
    3. Gefen, David & Reychav, Iris, 2014. "Why trustworthiness in an IT vendor is important even after the vendor left: IT is accepting the message and not just the messenger that is important," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 111-125.
    4. Sullivan, Yulia W. & Kim, Dan J., 2018. "Assessing the effects of consumers’ product evaluations and trust on repurchase intention in e-commerce environments," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 199-219.
    5. Meents, S. & Verhagen, T. & Vlaar, P.W.L., 2011. "How sellers can stimulate purchasing in electronic marketplaces: Using information as a risk reduction signal," Serie Research Memoranda 0014, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    6. Judy E. Scott & Dawn G. Gregg & Jae Hoon Choi, 2015. "Lemon complaints: When online auctions go sour," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 177-191, February.
    7. Balázs Kovács, 2024. "The Turing test of online reviews: Can we tell the difference between human-written and GPT-4-written online reviews?," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 651-666, December.
    8. Möhlmann, Mareike, 2021. "Unjustified trust beliefs: Trust conflation on sharing economy platforms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(3).
    9. Ben Q. Liu & Dale L. Goodhue, 2012. "Two Worlds of Trust for Potential E-Commerce Users: Humans as Cognitive Misers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1246-1262, December.
    10. Baozhou Lu & Rudy Hirschheim & Andrew Schwarz, 2015. "Examining the antecedent factors of online microsourcing," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 601-617, June.
    11. Rajković, Borislav & Đurić, Ivan & Zarić, Vlade & Glauben, Thomas, 2021. "Gaining trust in the digital age: The potential of social media for increasing the competitiveness of small and medium enterprises," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(4).
    12. Xiaojun Wu & Jiabin Shen, 2018. "A Study on Airbnb’s Trust Mechanism and the Effects of Cultural Values—Based on a Survey of Chinese Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    13. Malhotra, Neeru & Sahadev, Sunil & Purani, Keyoor, 2017. "Psychological contract violation and customer intention to reuse online retailers: Exploring mediating and moderating mechanisms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 17-28.
    14. Wu, Ing-Long, 2013. "The antecedents of customer satisfaction and its link to complaint intentions in online shopping: An integration of justice, technology, and trust," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 166-176.
    15. David Gefen & Paul A. Pavlou, 2012. "The Boundaries of Trust and Risk: The Quadratic Moderating Role of Institutional Structures," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-2), pages 940-959, September.
    16. Hikaru Yamamoto & Nina Sugiyama & Fujio Toriumi & Hikaru Kashida & Takuma Yamaguchi, 2019. "Angels or demons? Classifying desirable heavy users and undesirable power sellers in online C2C marketplace," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 315-329, July.
    17. Chen, Xiayu & Huang, Qian & Davison, Robert M., 2017. "The role of website quality and social capital in building buyers’ loyalty," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1563-1574.
    18. Alisa Frik & Luigi Mittone, 2016. "Factors Influencing the Perceived Websites' Privacy Trustworthiness and Users' Purchase Intentions," CEEL Working Papers 1609, Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    19. Tuncer, Ilhami, 2021. "The relationship between IT affordance, flow experience, trust, and social commerce intention: An exploration using the S-O-R paradigm," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    20. Hsing Kenneth Cheng & D. Daniel Sokol & Xinyu Zang, 2024. "The rise of empirical online platform research in the new millennium," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 416-451, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jeco00:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.