IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v5y2009i3p326-349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evaluation of manufacturing systems using concordance and disconcordance properties

Author

Listed:
  • Ateekh-Ur Rehman
  • A. Subash Babu

Abstract

The organisations that are in pursuit of reconfigurations are often presented with a number of options and, hence, face the problem of evaluating the feasible alternative configurations before choosing the best one. The problem becomes more dominant if the conditions wanting reconfigurations change from time to time. There are a variety of factors which may either support or oppose a particular alternative. Therefore, there is a need for an appropriate methodology to evaluate the different configurations. This paper presents an approach for the assessment of alternative configurations using multiple criteria. This paper considers a manufacturing system which produces 30 products using different conventional machines and process plans for each product. This system is simulated using ProModel 6.2. Subsequently, eight different alternative configurations were developed and simulated, each under 24 experiments. The simulated results that pertain to 216 experiments were subjected to analyses to establish the competitiveness of the alternative configurations. For this, the Elimination and Choice-Translating Algorithm (ELECTRE) was used. The details of the simulation models, the analysis of the results, the ELECTRE approach and the drawn inference are presented in the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Ateekh-Ur Rehman & A. Subash Babu, 2009. "The evaluation of manufacturing systems using concordance and disconcordance properties," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(3), pages 326-349.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:5:y:2009:i:3:p:326-349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=24150
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:5:y:2009:i:3:p:326-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.