IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v48y2024i4p576-601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation analysis and development of priority dispatching rules for a partial flexible job shop

Author

Listed:
  • S. Sudeesh
  • K. Rameshkumar
  • S.P. Anbuudayasankar
  • M. Thenarasu

Abstract

The focus of today's manufacturing strategy is to reap the benefits of flexibility, which makes it easier to adapt to changing production needs and requirements. Increased job shop flexibility has only added to the difficulty of scheduling operations. Partial flexible job shop scheduling is one in which a job operation can only be performed on one of a predefined subset of alternative machines. Priority dispatching rules (PDRs) are used to decide the order in which operations in the queue should be selected. In this study, a novel procedure has been devised to prioritise jobs in a partial flexible job shop. Entropy method has been used in this study for determining the weights for the conflicting criteria, and the VIKOR method is used to determine the priority of jobs. Discrete event simulation models are developed to evaluate the performance measures, namely makespan, flow time, and tardiness. Well-known benchmark instances and a large-scale real-world problem have been utilised to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. In both cases, the proposed MCDM-based priority rule performed well for makespan, flow time, and tardiness-based measurements.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Sudeesh & K. Rameshkumar & S.P. Anbuudayasankar & M. Thenarasu, 2024. "Simulation analysis and development of priority dispatching rules for a partial flexible job shop," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 48(4), pages 576-601.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:48:y:2024:i:4:p:576-601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=140423
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:48:y:2024:i:4:p:576-601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.