IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v47y2024i1p29-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How organisation deviance affects employees' perception: a quantitative analysis on managing workplace emotions

Author

Listed:
  • Chiehwen Ed Hsu
  • S. Yeshwant Raj
  • Taksaporn Boonroungkaw

Abstract

This study offers an empirical model that investigates realistically the subordinate work performance and also analyses the progressively devastating effects for workers of the theory of conservation of resources on their emotional tiredness and organisational deviance which has made a keen interest for a lot of scholars in the recent decades. The study has used a quantitative analysis by using structured equation modelling (SEM) in PLS, and 300 full-time employees from diverse sectors in Taiwan including manufacturers, businesses, government organisations, etc., have collected data via an online questionnaire. We also showed that abusive supervision and job overload led to emotional distress. Our findings are unique, unlike the literature. We concluded that abusive supervision and overloaded positions are both significant contributors to emotional exhaustion. The finding shows that procedural justice may not be the most effective way to deal with emotional exhaustion. In this study, both management and practical aspects are explored. The study demonstrates that procedural justice evaluations are not negatively linked to emotional exhaustion. Our data suggest that employees seem emotionally exhausted to be organisationally deviant.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiehwen Ed Hsu & S. Yeshwant Raj & Taksaporn Boonroungkaw, 2024. "How organisation deviance affects employees' perception: a quantitative analysis on managing workplace emotions," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 47(1), pages 29-46.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:47:y:2024:i:1:p:29-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=136834
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:47:y:2024:i:1:p:29-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.