IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v3y2007i1p23-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New product development benchmarking to enhance operation competitiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Suhaiza Zailani
  • Premkumar Rajagopal
  • Junaimah Jauhar
  • Nabsiah Abdul Wahid

Abstract

The long-term survival of a business enterprise hinges upon its ability to introduce new products into the marketplace faster and better than its competitors. In search of the recipe for success, companies have widely adopted the NPD benchmarking to understand the best practices being used throughout the industry. The authors will attempt to provide an overview of NPD benchmarking practices since 30 years ago found from the studies in the literature and to identify those considered as 'best practices'. In doing so, the results of important research efforts undertaken during the last three decades will be summarised. The key conclusions from past studies indicate that NPD processes continue to evolve and to become more sophisticated. Interestingly, more than one-third of all firms in the latest study still use no formal process for managing NPD. The best-practice firms participating in this study do not use financial rewards for NPD. Furthermore, best-practice firms that use more multifunctional teams are more likely to measure NPD processes and outcomes and therefore expect more from the NPD programmes. However, top management support and involvement was an important predictor of NPD.

Suggested Citation

  • Suhaiza Zailani & Premkumar Rajagopal & Junaimah Jauhar & Nabsiah Abdul Wahid, 2007. "New product development benchmarking to enhance operation competitiveness," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 23-40.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:3:y:2007:i:1:p:23-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=11460
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:3:y:2007:i:1:p:23-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.