IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v10y2011i1p13-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What is the right cash conversion cycle for your supply chain?

Author

Listed:
  • Pan Theo Grosse-Ruyken
  • Stephan M. Wagner
  • Ruben Jonke

Abstract

Supply chain finance is undergoing a transformation. Supply chains are often so tightly coupled that the domino effect of suboptimal working capital management can lead to financial glitches at a single supplier and even bankruptcy. Thus, each working capital management decision should consider every upstream and downstream partner within the supply chain. The cash conversion cycle (CCC) is therefore an excellent measure of a firm's performance. Results indicate a significant negative relationship between the CCC and return on capital employed (ROCE). We argue that the optimal level of CCC for responsive supply chains must be assessed holistically, and conclude that the right working capital management depends on the business model, its specific supply chain design configurations, and risk aspects within the supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Pan Theo Grosse-Ruyken & Stephan M. Wagner & Ruben Jonke, 2011. "What is the right cash conversion cycle for your supply chain?," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 13-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:10:y:2011:i:1:p:13-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=41987
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erik Hofmann & Juuso Töyli & Tomi Solakivi, 2022. "Working Capital Behavior of Firms during an Economic Downturn: An Analysis of the Financial Crisis Era," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Weiwei Chen & Benjamin Melamed & Oleg Sokolinskiy & Ben Sopranzetti, 2017. "Cash Conversion Systems in Corporate Subsidiaries," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 604-619, October.
    3. Katerina Lyroudi & Sophia Nema, 2020. "The Effect of the Cash Conversion Cycle on the Z-scores of Fresh Milk Companies in Greece," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 1, pages 105-137, March.
    4. Brandenburg, Marcus, 2016. "Supply chain efficiency, value creation and the economic crisis – An empirical assessment of the European automotive industry 2002–2010," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P3), pages 321-335.
    5. Jahani, Hamed & Abbasi, Babak & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Klibi, Walid, 2024. "Supply chain network design with financial considerations: A comprehensive review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 799-839.
    6. Wetzel, Philipp & Hofmann, Erik, 2019. "Supply chain finance, financial constraints and corporate performance: An explorative network analysis and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 364-383.
    7. Abdul Basyith & Abid Djazuli & Fitriya Fauzi, 2021. "Does Working Capital Management Affect Profitability? Empirical Evidence from Indonesia Listed Firms," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(3), pages 236-251, March.
    8. Grzegorz Zimon, 2020. "Financial Liquidity Management Strategies in Polish Energy Companies," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 365-368.
    9. Amarjit Gill & Harvinder S. Mand & Afshin Amiraslany & Neil Mathur, 2020. "Efficient Working Capital Management and the Cost of Debt," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 19(2), pages 131-149, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:10:y:2011:i:1:p:13-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.