IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v20y2017i4p429-461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of soft TQM and hard TQM on innovation performance: the moderating effect of organisational culture

Author

Listed:
  • Kanagi Kanapathy
  • Chiok Sook Bin
  • Suhaiza Zailani
  • Ali Haj Aghapour

Abstract

Literature increasingly recognises the importance of organisational culture when implementing operations management practices. This paper examines the relationships among quality, innovation, and organisational culture under a moderation model. The research model is constructed based on well-established theories of competing values framework (CVF) and total quality management (TQM). A cross-sectional study was conducted amongst 106 ISO 9000-certified manufacturers where data were collected from senior managers with sufficient knowledge. Partial least square analysis indicates that: 1) innovation is influenced mainly by adopting soft (organisational) TQM elements and secondarily hard (process) TQM elements; 2) innovation organisational culture has a stronger moderating influence on process-related TQM than on organisational TQM, although its interactions are mostly insignificant. Therefore, practitioners are advised to emphasise the organisational aspect of TQM rather than process-related practices when assessing the innovation performance of an organisation. The findings recommend firms to have a balanced view on cultures in organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kanagi Kanapathy & Chiok Sook Bin & Suhaiza Zailani & Ali Haj Aghapour, 2017. "The impact of soft TQM and hard TQM on innovation performance: the moderating effect of organisational culture," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(4), pages 429-461.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:20:y:2017:i:4:p:429-461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=82831
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Younès El Manzani & Mohamed Larbi Sidmou & Jean-Jack Cegarra, 2018. "Does IS0 9001 quality management system support product innovation? An analysis from the sociotechnical systems theory," Post-Print hal-03080217, HAL.
    2. Sonda DAOUD BEN ARAB, 2022. "Quality Management Practices and Innovation: the Moderating Effect of ISO 9001 Certification," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2177-2202, September.
    3. Oluwaseun Niyi Anifowose & Matina Ghasemi & Banji Rildwan Olaleye, 2022. "Total Quality Management and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises’ (SMEs) Performance: Mediating Role of Innovation Speed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Hatane Semuel & Yenni Mangoting & Saarce Elsye Hatane, 2022. "The Interpretation of Quality in the Sustainability of Indonesian Traditional Weaving," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Younès El Manzani & Mostapha El Idrissi & Zakaria Lissaneddine, 2022. "Soft quality management practices and product innovation ambidexterity: the mediating role of market orientation ambidexterity," Post-Print hal-04317941, HAL.
    6. I. Wahyudi & A.I. Suroso & B. Arifin & M.S. Rusli & R. Syarief, 2024. "The effect of corporate entrepreneurship on firm performance: evidence from lubricant distributor firms in Indonesia," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 41(2), pages 236-261.
    7. Marina Žižakov & Teodora Vuckovic & Srđan Vulanović & Dušanka Dakić & Milan Delić, 2023. "Investigating the Key Factors Influencing the Process Innovation Capability in Organizations: Evidence from the Republic of Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:20:y:2017:i:4:p:429-461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.