IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmpra/v7y2014i2p108-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building intra-organisational trust with managerial communications

Author

Listed:
  • Risto Seppänen
  • Miia Kosonen
  • Mika Vanhala
  • Hanna-Kaisa Ellonen

Abstract

Trust is seen as a critical element in the knowledge-based network economy by virtue of it having a number of important benefits for organisations. Previous research has suggested that intra-organisational communication and information sharing are essential factors in trust-building processes. Managers and managerial communication, in particular, are seen as key actors. In this study, the relationships between different forms of managerial communication and the experience of intra-organisational trust is examined. The study adds to the literature by applying motivational language theory in explaining trust within organisations. The findings verify that all three dimensions of managerial communication, according to motivational language theory, are crucial elements in both building and maintaining trust within an organisation. The results also indicate a notable gap in perceived trust that depends on whether managers communicate with their subordinates face-to-face or online. Thus, managers should consciously choose the channels depending on the task at hand, as well as pay more attention to social communication online and establish less task-focused management cultures.

Suggested Citation

  • Risto Seppänen & Miia Kosonen & Mika Vanhala & Hanna-Kaisa Ellonen, 2014. "Building intra-organisational trust with managerial communications," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 108-125.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:7:y:2014:i:2:p:108-125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=61473
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:7:y:2014:i:2:p:108-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=91 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.